Wikipedia:Featured article review/Accurate News and Information Act/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 2:56, 14 May 2022 (UTC) [1].
Accurate News and Information Act[edit]
- Notified: Steve Smith, WikiProject Freedom of speech, WikiProject Canada, WikiProject Alberta, WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada, WikiProject Politics, WikiProject Law, [2]
Review section[edit]
I am nominating this featured article for review because I am concerned that this article is missing significant research and commentary from a variety of sources. This is one of Wikipedia's shorter FAs, so I did a search to see if there were additional sources published, especially after this article's promotion. After a quick search, I was able to find some sources that were not in the article. Today, I did another search and quickly found more sources that could be included in the article. These sources are from academic publications such as university presses. These sources have been placed on the article's talk page.
I am also concerned that there is no Legacy section, and the Aftermath section stops with a newspaper receiving a Pulitzer Prize; since this went to the Supreme Court of Canada, I would like information about how this ruling was referenced in other court cases or what precedence it might have established for future cases. Z1720 (talk) 14:49, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, zero progress. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, one edit this year. Hog Farm Talk 13:41, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section[edit]
- Issues raised in the review section include comprehensiveness and sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no edits since March, the concerns about unused sources are still present. Z1720 (talk) 00:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist would need substantial edits to meet comprehensiveness/well-researched (t · c) buidhe 01:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, issues unaddressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - this article does not appear to be comprehensive enough in the aftermath section. Hog Farm Talk 14:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:56, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.