Wikipedia:Featured article review/Husein Gradaščević/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed 11:34, 10 March 2007.
Husein Gradaščević[edit]
Review commentary[edit]
- Message left at Life Forever. Todor→Bozhinov 21:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Messages left at Milhist and Biography. LuciferMorgan 22:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Gosh, this article needs some considerable improvements to retain its FA status. It is very badly referenced: there are absolutely no footnotes (for an article of that size I would say it needs at least 50, if not more) and only three main references (all in Bosnian... something in English would be nice). Also, the article is packed with red links, which means there is little context provided. Many of the images are quite irrelevant and contribute little to the article (views of Sarajevo and Istanbul?), and there are some formatting and sectioning issues (e.g. no use of cite templates, some undesired short lists within the prose, "Biography" is quite unnecessary as a heading — subsections should be sections). Finally, a more concise lead section would be appreciated, perhaps two and not three paragraphs of that size. Todor→Bozhinov 21:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Lacks inline citations: "Husein Gradaščević was a living legend in his own time." + Ceoil 23:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per above Wandalstouring 13:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC DrKiernan 09:08, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove as reviewer. Sadly, no effort whatsoever to improve it :( Todor→Bozhinov 20:59, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary[edit]
- Suggested FA criteria concerns include referencing (1c), images (3), sectioning and formatting issues (2). Marskell 09:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove — no work done since nomination. Heck, the article has fewer than 50 edits in the last year and a half. I doubt this will be kept. — Deckiller 09:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per 1c. LuciferMorgan 22:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove fails 1c, no one trying to improve it. Raystorm 14:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.