Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/50 Cent discography/archive2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 03:41, 26 December 2007.

50 Cent discography[edit]

All the objections from the previous nominations have been addressed .--Shadyaftrmathgunit (talk) 20:04, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support I know this is a bit overdue, but I believe the issues in the last nomination have been addressed. The objections were only minor formatting tweaks. Spellcast (talk) 23:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Looks pretty good! I only have a few minor suggestions:

  • Ideally the title of all releases 2 (within tables) should be in bold and italicized (this doesn't include singles or music videos). I'm not sure if the way I said that made sense, so just take a look at other discogs.
I could be wrong but doesn't that go against MOS:BOLD? It says to not bold things for emphasis unless it's table headers (in this case, things like "Chart positions" and "Sales and certifications"). Spellcast (talk) 15:51, 21 December007 (UTC)
I'm not sure what MOS says, I'm just going off what pretty much every other FL discog looks like. I guess it's because the release titles are the most important bit of information for every row, and since every row is defined by the release.
It says that on the cover, but judging by the many soundtracks in Category:Film soundtracks, many simply use the shorter form. Spellcast (talk) 15:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but I think it would be a good idea to either change it to Music from and Inspired by the Motion Picture Get Rich or Die Tryin or Get Rich or Die Tryin soundtrack or Get Rich or Die Tryin original soundtrack or something like that. The word "soundtrack" in parenthesis just bothers me for some reason, since it's technically not part of the title.
  • "An asterisk (*) indicates that the album is active on the charts." seems unnecessary at the moment since no album is active.
Done. I've removed them until they become active. Spellcast (talk) 15:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Along the same lines, both the asterisk and em dash note should ideally match the other discogs which say " "—" denotes releases that did not chart." Furthermore, for the sake of consistency, it should be — and not –. So it shouldn't be an m-dash in the first place (and I'm not sure what you call the long dash)
I think it should be alright now. Spellcast (talk) 15:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think the mixtapes should be given their own section, since he's somewhat known for his mixtapes.
The mixtapes were redirected to the main biography because they were just track lists with no potential to expand. Besides, all the relevant info on the mixtapes is already mentioned in 50 Cent. If anyone (re)creates them in a better form, I'll be sure to link to it. Spellcast (talk) 15:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Consider that point taken care of.
  • I also checked the reference for the greatest hits album, and it doesn't actually say that the title of the album is "Greatest Hits". So I think it should be changed to something less official and un-italicized, such as "Greatest Hits album" or "Untitled Greatest Hits album" or something like that. Drewcifer (talk) 20:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah you're right. I changed it to "Greatest hits album". Spellcast (talk) 21:29, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, fairly minor stuff. If you can take care of the above, I'd be happy to give my support. Drewcifer (talk) 09:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: White-space issues...
  • Could you make the "Studio albums", "Compilations", "Solo", "As featured performer", "Guest appearances" tables 100% width?
    • "Guest appearances" is 100%. For the others, the code has this: width="40". 100 makes it too wide (try it yourself). It seems anything between 35 to 45 is good. I changed it from 35 to 40. If you think it should be wider, just say so. Spellcast (talk) 17:22, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Doesn't the 100% width on the studio albums cause a lot of unnecessary widening, especially on the year, title, and sales column? Spellcast (talk) 11:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have no clue what to do about all the space to the right of "Unreleased" and "Mixtapes".
  • Any way to add more pictures? Just a thought, not a show-stopper.
    • If anyone provides extra free pics, I'll add it. Spellcast (talk) 17:22, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please {{reflist|2}} to tighten that section up.
    • Just did the reflist|2 issue. --Flesh-n-Bone 15:06, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 02:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - A clean and useful list that is taken care of, very well. Flesh-n-Bone 15:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Very well sourced and comprehensive list. Hpfan9374 (talk) 02:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/50_Cent_discography/archive2&oldid=375219211"