Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Courtney Love discography
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Courtney Love discography[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: Withdrawn. Scorpion0422 04:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a discography of Courtney Love including her releases with Hole. I believe that it meets all the featured list criteria. This list differs from the similar list John Frusciante discography in that it contains chart information. --Brandt Luke Zorn 03:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Nobody's Daughter is missing charting information, release dates, sales and other information. Why is "Mono" bolded and "Hold On To Me" is not? "Hold On To Me" has date formatting inconsistencies as well. Some of the columns could do with widening, as well. ~ Sebi 08:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Nobody's Daughter is an upcoming release and only its title has been announced. I bolded the single title you mentioned and fixed its date formatting. I notice that you widened the column for the Hole videos table yourself; are there any others columns specifically that you think should be widened? --Brandt Luke Zorn 15:16, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No, none in particular. After looking at the columns again when I'm not just about to fall asleep, none of them require widening. As for the unreleased album, perhaps a note along the lines of "To be released", or something, but perhaps not the acronym, or that attracts users from Amazon.com to add supposed release dates that Amazon.com claim are correct ;) ~ Sebi 20:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Got it. I put "To be released" underneath the title. Anything else? --Brandt Luke Zorn 21:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope, nothing more, looks better now. Good job on this one, you seem to always do a fairly good job on the discographies you work on :) Support. ~ Sebi 04:44, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you! --Brandt Luke Zorn 05:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. Idiosyncratic use of chart names instead of the country (or the more usual "U.S. mod. rock" or similar for specialized charts), also, the Hole material belongs in Hole discography, not here, although a "see also" should be included. Compare Trent Reznor discography and Nine Inch Nails discography. Circeus 17:52, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I shortened some of the chart names. I removed the section on Hole's singles, but I felt uncomfortable removing all mention of Hole so I simplified the "Albums and EPs" section. --Brandt Luke Zorn 20:02, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Look at Gwen Stefani discography, it explicitly excludes material she made with No Doubt. Unless she was associated (as opposed as being a full member) with Hole, that material has no matter there as anything but note that she was a member of that band before carrying a solo carreer. While I understand the issues have more to do with how removing that material makes the list very much on the edge of "too short", it is my definite feeling that the scope issue should trump the goal of pushing this to FL status. Circeus 20:08, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, I removed all Hole-related releases and created a "See also" section linked to Hole discography. --Brandt Luke Zorn 20:27, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Look at Gwen Stefani discography, it explicitly excludes material she made with No Doubt. Unless she was associated (as opposed as being a full member) with Hole, that material has no matter there as anything but note that she was a member of that band before carrying a solo carreer. While I understand the issues have more to do with how removing that material makes the list very much on the edge of "too short", it is my definite feeling that the scope issue should trump the goal of pushing this to FL status. Circeus 20:08, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I shortened some of the chart names. I removed the section on Hole's singles, but I felt uncomfortable removing all mention of Hole so I simplified the "Albums and EPs" section. --Brandt Luke Zorn 20:02, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Without the Hole stuff, it seems too short to be an FL and I see no reason why the information couldn't just be included in the Courtney Love page. -- Scorpion0422 22:23, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- ... So it's clear that I can't please both you and Circeus. Can some compromise be reached? This version of the page includes Hole's albums and EPs, but not their singles. It's similar to how the RHCP's albums are presented on John Frusciante discography. --Brandt Luke Zorn 22:37, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not so much a catch-22 as a not very ideal choice fro a FL for the time being (that is, until she release some more material), I'm afraid. I'm actually of the same opinion as Scorpion (that it is at best a dubious length). Circeus 23:13, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm... Alright then. I suppose this would be better suited as a FL in 2008 or 09. Can I withdraw my nomination now? --Brandt Luke Zorn 23:21, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a well-formatted list, it just needs a little more length. One more album and a few singles ought to do that. Are you sure you want to withdraw it? -- Scorpion0422 02:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sure. I'll wait until Nobody's Daughter and the next slew of singles comes out. --Brandt Luke Zorn 02:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a well-formatted list, it just needs a little more length. One more album and a few singles ought to do that. Are you sure you want to withdraw it? -- Scorpion0422 02:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm... Alright then. I suppose this would be better suited as a FL in 2008 or 09. Can I withdraw my nomination now? --Brandt Luke Zorn 23:21, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not so much a catch-22 as a not very ideal choice fro a FL for the time being (that is, until she release some more material), I'm afraid. I'm actually of the same opinion as Scorpion (that it is at best a dubious length). Circeus 23:13, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- ... So it's clear that I can't please both you and Circeus. Can some compromise be reached? This version of the page includes Hole's albums and EPs, but not their singles. It's similar to how the RHCP's albums are presented on John Frusciante discography. --Brandt Luke Zorn 22:37, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]