Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Dayahang Rai filmography/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 17 December 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Dayahang Rai filmography[edit]

Featured list candidates/Dayahang Rai filmography/archive1

Nominator(s): ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 14:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dayahang Rai is a Nepali actor. He has appeared in more than 40 films to date. Some of his well-known films includes Loot, Kabaddi, Talakjung vs Tulke, Kabaddi Kabaddi, White Sun, and Loot 2 ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 14:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

;Comments

"The same year, Rai appeared in mystery Dasdhunga" => "The same year, Rai appeared in the mystery Dasdhunga"
"in which he starred as Gofle who with his four friends set out" => "in which he starred as Gofle, who with his four friends sets out"
"goes to Kathmandu to go to a foreign country" - can you use a different word instead of one of the two uses of "go" so that you aren't using it twice so close together? Travel, maybe.....?
Think that's it from me - great work overall! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisTheDude, All done. Thanks for the comments! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:03, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Dank

Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
FLC criteria:
1. The prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. I checked the links in the second and third columns in the table. The coding in the table seems fine. I added {{sronly|Films}} as a table caption.
2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
3b. The article is well-sourced to apparently reliable sources (I can't read some of them), and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
4. It is navigable.
5. It meets style requirements.
6. It is stable.
Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 23:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~ HAL333 23:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source review – Pass[edit]

Doing now Aza24 (talk) 01:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consistent retrieval dates (thank you!)
"The Kathmandu Post. Kathmandu." for ref 9 but just "The Kathmandu Post." for the others?
Reliabillity looks fine, found no other formatting issues.
Pass for source review with the expectation that the minor point above will be addressed. Best - Aza24 (talk) 02:08, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. --Pres N 20:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.