Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of CHA Men's Ice Hockey Tournament champions/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 08:05, 7 February 2013 [1].

List of CHA Men's Ice Hockey Tournament champions[edit]

Nominator(s): – Nurmsook! ^talk... 18:27, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the first in a series of similar NCAA ice hockey tournament champions lists that I am completing in the hopes of achieve FL standing. This list was previously listed as an FLC, but I withdrew it at that time due to ongoing discussions at WP:WIAFL. In the years since, those discussions have been settled, so I am listing this again (though the list has been much improved since). Cheers! – Nurmsook! ^talk... 18:27, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment sorry to say that I'm currently leaning to an oppose on 3b. This list's content already exists (albeit in a slightly different format) in the relevant section in the main article. Indeed, the lead here could usefully be used to replace the very weak lead in the main article. Besides good referencing here, I'm not sure why this should standalone, but I say that purely as a reviewer and will leave it to others to offer comments. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – Sorry, but in terms of 3b I don't think much has changed from the last FAC. The list could be, and part of it is, reasonably included in the main College Hockey America article, as it is a relatively small list that doesn't take up much room there. Also, I'd question whether the general reference, augenblick.org, is a reliable source. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Clearly covered in a much better format as a list with more information and better formatting than could be found trying to shoe horn it into an article. -DJSasso (talk) 18:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly a shoe-horn. Just a section that can exist in the main article easily. A tiny bit of the lead doesn't exist in the main CHA article, but the main table already does, just not with so much info. Everything else is a repeat. Plus, I'm not even sure that "CHA Men's Ice Hockey Tournament" exists. I Googled it, it just led to Wikipedia and its mirrors. Perhaps this is an artificial branch from the main CHA article? The Rambling Man (talk) 18:20, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well it could probably be all merged into that article. I think it is just presented better on its own. As for the search I think its just due to the name scheme we use for disambiguating the types of hockey (we always say ice hockey on all articles) and in this case the gender of the tournament. If you do a search for "CHA tournament" you will see a lot more. We could however drop the "ice hockey" from the title since the CHA is an ice hockey only conference. -DJSasso (talk) 18:32, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure we could argue over the name, but that's not really appropriate here other than to question that this actually exists as defined. The main point is that this list easily (as I demonstrated) fits into the main article. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:35, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sorry but I agree with Rambling Man and Giants2008. That table is way too short and may fit perfectly in the main article. Regards. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 20:09, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.