Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Christian number-one singles of 2005 (U.S.)/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by Giants2008 20:24, 18 December 2011 [1].

List of Christian number-one singles of 2005 (U.S.)[edit]

Featured list candidates/List of Christian number-one singles of 2005 (U.S.)/archive1

Nominator(s): Toa Nidhiki05 02:21, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it adequately fits the FL criteria.

The prose is of solid standard, fitting criteria 1.

The lede, while a tad bit short, adequately fits criteria 2 (It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria) by defining both the chart itself and the criteria for inclusion in the article.

The article suitably fits 3a (It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items.) by noting the length of time each single spent at number one in both the lead and the list itself. While the length of each single is listed without a source, it fits WP:CALC as the calculation of the length each song spent is both routine and uncontroversial.

The article is fit for a stand-alone list, consistent with 3b. It also meets the rest of the criteria.

The article fits 5a by including a table format used on most other FL class chart history lists. It also fits 5b by including images of some of the performers mentioned in the list, and all images are of appropriate usage for the article.

Toa Nidhiki05 02:21, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment just my opinion, but we have tended to merge these single-year chart lists into multiple years, particularly as this has only nine distinct entries. Not convinced it's going to pass 3b. But as I said, just my opinion. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:24, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per 3b. This list is a part of the bigger scope that's not separated reasonably. I'll support a list similar to List of 2000s UK Singles Chart number ones. --Cheetah (talk) 03:12, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - We actually have a great deal of templates and lists for individual US charts - look here. Some are quite minor, actually, such as the Dance Airplay and Tropical Songs charts. Toa Nidhiki05 15:28, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- But we're discussing this list. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.