Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Eve episodes/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 26 March 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Eve episodes[edit]

List of Eve episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Aoba47 (talk) 23:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone! The following is a list of episodes for Eve, an American television sitcom that revolves around two sets of male and female friends attempting to navigate relationships with the opposite sex. I would greatly appreciate any feedback for this list. Thank you in advance. Aoba47 (talk) 23:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from 1989
  • The lead looks good. I have no comments for that.
  • I see only a few episodes that claim the viewership. If you can't find the ones that are missing, that's fine.
  • Unfortunately, I cannot find the ratings for the other episodes. Aoba47 (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The summaries of the episodes are pretty short. Maybe expand them?
  • I have attempted to expand some of the summaries, but unfortunately, I could not do that much as I have never actually watched a single episode of this show. I mostly relied on the episode summaries that were already in the list before I expanded it. Aoba47 (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MCMLXXXIX 23:10, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @1989: I have responded to your comments. Thank you for your input! I greatly appreciate it, and look forward to hearing back from you. Aoba47 (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support @Aoba47: Fair enough. Good work. When you have the chance, could you review my FLC? MCMLXXXIX 00:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @1989: Thank you for your support and I will provide comments for your FLC by the end of tomorrow if that is okay. Aoba47 (talk) 00:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from User:Tintor2[edit]

The article looks in really good shape but I wonder why there is no information about the home media release of the series. Is it not applied in this project's guidelines? Anyways, that's the only issue I found besides adding references to every season's introduction. Wikipedia's summaries are written as neutral as possible so I don't why you need help from another source. Ping when you reply me.Tintor2 (talk) 13:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Tintor2: Thank you for your comments! I have included information about the home media release of the series in the last sentence of the lead. It was never released on DVD or Blu-ray (most likely due to either lack of demand, the amount of copyrighted music, or a combination of both) and it only received a digital release through iTunes and Amazon.com. This information cannot really be represented in a table as done with physical home media releases, and I am not sure if it would be worth it to create a separate section that would only be repeating a sentence already found in the lead (the iTunes and Amazon releases are just the episodes and do not include any special features or anything else noteworthy). I have removed the references from the summaries per your comment. I need to read through Wikipedia's policies on summaries in the near future. Thank you again and I apologize for the long response. Aoba47 (talk) 14:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Okay then, I'll support it. Good work Tintor2 (talk) 16:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 17:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Tintor2: Hello again! I apologize for the random message/ping, but I was wondering if you could do a source review for this. It should be relatively straight-forward, but I understand if you do not have the time. I am just curious as this has been sitting here for a little bit of time and I would like to get some forward progress done on it. Aoba47 (talk) 21:37, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Source review.

All sources appear to be reliable and are archived in case we lose the original. I'll support but doesn't the final one lack a wikilink for "TV Art". Then again I'm not too familar with the project. Good work.Tintor2 (talk) 21:56, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support from User:AffeL[edit]

Support. The article looks great. I can't seem to find any problems with it. - AffeL (talk) 16:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @AffeL: Thank you for your response and I look forward to working with you further in the future. Aoba47 (talk) 16:41, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Carbrera[edit]

  • On Reference #1, fix the publication link so it is no longer a redirect. Other than that I support this candidate. Carbrera (talk) 06:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]
  • @Carbrera: Thank you for your comment. I have corrected the publication link. Aoba47 (talk) 19:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@WP:FLC director and delegates: Just providing a note to the FLC coordinators that I think this is ready for promotion as it has a source review and comments. Aoba47 (talk) 22:32, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll do a review of the list in due course. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you; I apologize for the inconvenience and pinging you >< Aoba47 (talk) 22:32, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No apology necessary. I'll get to reviewing this as soon as I can, hopefully within the next 24 hours. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 10:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Any reason for the image caption to be centrally aligned?
  • I copied and pasted the template from another article, and accidentally left in the central alignment. It has been removed. Aoba47 (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • " most often-recurring" looks odd to me, perhaps "most frequently recurring".
  • Overview table, should that "U.S. viewers" be an "average"? What does the number actually represent?
  • It should represent the average number of U.S. viewers that watched that seasons. However, after looking at it again, I am not sure if it is necessary and it could be safely removed. What do you think about it? Aoba47 (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • " at the end of Casablanca ." remove space before the full stop.
  • A lot of episodes have no viewer ratings, perhaps N/A instead of the em-dash.
  • Good idea, I will complete this by the end of the day. Aoba47 (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Original air date references could all be put into the table header instead of repeating the same thing each and every line.
  • Very true. I was wondering if I could that as it is unnecessarily repetitive as it currently stands. I will also get to this by the end of the day if that is okay. Aoba47 (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I apologize for this. I should have checked this more closely. I believe that I have caught all of them, but I will do another run-through later today when I complete the above two comments. Aoba47 (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Any updates on this? Aoba47 (talk) 03:34, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_Eve_episodes/archive1&oldid=1141921501"