Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Most Played Juke Box Folk Records number ones of 1944/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 21:16:31 25 April 2019 (UTC) [1].
List of Most Played Juke Box Folk Records number ones of 1944[edit]
List of Most Played Juke Box Folk Records number ones of 1944 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Following two promotions earlier today, there are now 23 FLs for lists of Billboard number one country songs by year, so for the next one I thought I would do something a bit different. This list represents the number one songs from the very first year in which the magazine published a country songs chart, way back in the dark days of the Second World War. At the time the term "country music" had not come into standard usage, but this chart (which began using the term in 1949) is regarded by noted chart historian Joel Whitburn and others as the beginning of the lineage of the current Hot Country Songs chart. As ever, I will respond promptly to any queries or concerns raised. All the best, ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Lirim.Z
- WP:Tables The scopes should be the issue dates in this case
- Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The main issue in this list are the references. All these Google Books references need to be cited with Template:Cite book with page numbers, year, etc...
- —Lirim | Talk 15:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Looks great as always. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 15:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Would it be possible to get the google books links to go to the actual page rather than a search result list? For example, have ref 13 link to this page rather than this one? Thanks. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 07:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem, I didn't know you could do it like that. I'll get that change made over the next day or two...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: Done - didn't actually take that long once I figured out the syntax.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:19, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Great. I just think it helps the reader go to the direct page for confirmation. Thanks. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: Done - didn't actually take that long once I figured out the syntax.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:19, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem, I didn't know you could do it like that. I'll get that change made over the next day or two...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
CommentSupport –I reviewed the list and have only one nit-pick: the ranges in the titles of references 4 and 9 need en dashes.Other than that, the list is in good shape. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:17, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]- @Giants2008: - done - sorry for the delay, been away on holiday -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed, promoting. --PresN 21:16, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.