Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023)/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023)[edit]

List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Nominator(s): 98Tigerius (talk) and EN-Jungwon (talk) 18:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first time with En-Jungwon nominating a list article to a FL status. It is the ninth article in the series and the list follows the same pattern as previous lists. Suggestions for improvement are welcome. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 18:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

  • "global pre-vote derived from Mubeat app" => "global pre-vote derived from the Mubeat app"
  • "...and Umji[14] appeared" => "and Umji[14] have appeared"
  • " Six boy groups ranked two singles at number one on the chart in 2023. TXT with" => " Six boy groups ranked two singles at number one on the chart in 2023: TXT with"
  • ""Rover", "Killin' Me Good", and "Perfume", helped" => ""Rover", "Killin' Me Good", and "Perfume" helped"
  • "gain their first ever music show award" => "gain their first ever music show awards"
  • "BTS members Jimin, V, and Jungkook gained their first number ones" => "BTS members Jimin, V, and Jungkook gained their first solo number ones"
  • "Exo's Kai and Twice' Jihyo received" => "Exo's Kai and Twice's Jihyo received"
  • "(From left to right) Blackpink's Jisoo, BTS' Jimin, V and Jungkook " - on my screen at least they are in two rows of two so "from left to right" doesn't make sense.
  • That's what I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrisTheDude: Done the first to seventh parts while the last part I modified it from "(From left to right) Blackpink's Jisoo, BTS' Jimin, V and Jungkook " to "Blackpink's Jisoo (top left), BTS' Jimin (top right), V (bottom left) and Jungkook (bottom right) ". 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 08:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
MPGuy2824's comments

Dylan620[edit]

Placeholder for image review; will start looking at this tonight or tomorrow. Dylan620 (he/him • talkedits) 22:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some comments:
  • File:Park Jihyo for Pearly Gates Korea 02.jpg – Verification issue here. This file's information page describes it as a screenshot of a YouTube video, but the video link provided as a source doesn't seem to portray Jihyo as she appears here; the hat in the photo is not present in the video.
  • Otherwise, the sources for each image/screenshot check out. In future, when using a YouTube screenshot, I recommend adding the video timestamp for the screenshot in question to the description page for the upload, though I have just done so for this list's screenshots (where possible) over at Commons; see my recent edits there.
  • Everything else looks good:
    • Each image has appropriate alt text.
    • Each image contributes encyclopedic value to the listicle.
    • Each image is appropriately licensed, though I did need to look quite hard on the source for the Jisoo photo to verify its licensing information.
I look forward to supporting once the Jihyo image issue is resolved. Dylan620 (he/him • talkedits) 01:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dylan620 the source link given in the file description was incorrect. I have found the actual video and fixed the link in the file description. Thanks for the review. -- EN-Jungwon 03:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for addressing this. I am happy to support this nomination. Dylan620 (he/him • talkedits) 11:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dank[edit]

  • Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
  • In the table, maybe "(G)I-dle" should be sorted under G instead of "(".
  • Checking the FLC criteria:
  • 1. I did a little copyediting; feel free to revert. Otherwise, nothing is jumping out at me as a prose problem. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the table.
  • 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
  • 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
  • 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
  • 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
  • 4. It is navigable.
  • 5. It meets style requirements. You've got an image review already.
  • 6. It is stable.
  • Close enough for a support. Well done. I don't read Korean at all, so I can't cover all of the sources. - Dank (push to talk) 03:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dank: Done sorting "(G)I-dle". 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 05:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]