Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of S.H.E awards/archive3

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:26, 11 October 2008 [1].

List of S.H.E awards[edit]

previous FLC (16:20, 18 August 2008)

Table issues from previous FLC were finally resolved. Nominating the list for a third time because, again, I believe it fits FL criteria. Pandacomics (talk) 06:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments - unable to evaluate the non-English sources for reliablity. Link checker tool shows several dead links. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links resolved. Feel free to re-run the tool to check. Pandacomics (talk) 15:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Gary King (talk · contribs)

I'm not sure why, but the tables are "broken". A lot of the rows in the tables don't have borders on the far right.

Gary King (talk) 03:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe browser cache? I mean, if the rows truly missed a " | " or something, the tables would be noticeably more wonky and wouldn't have the data neatly placed into its cells. I myself had to clear my cache quite a few times just to get the borders to show up. Pandacomics (talk) 05:29, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No Gary is right they are all messed up. I have fixed the one for the "HITO Radio Music Awards" section to show you the problems. Can you fix the rest please. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 10:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you list which rows have problems? Because, as mentioned above, I don't seem to have the table problems on my end, thereby making it enormously hard for me to see which ones you and Gary are having glitches with. Pandacomics (talk) 18:40, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed all the tables and the template. They were all being forced to work unaturally which caused odd bordering between rows (due to incorrect rowspans and extra row breaks). I've left a note on your talk page with details that might be useful in future. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 20:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:08, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Not sure about the odd bolding in the lead sentence. And what's the difference between an "award" and an "accolade"?
What criteria have you applied to inclusion of awards/accolades in this list per WP:WIAFL criterion 3? Most of the awards you have have noted do not even have articles in Wikipedia - are they notable? If so I guess they should have articles?
Still no solution for the predominantly non-English citations.
Combination of linked and unlinked dates in the citations.

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:00, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

None. Fixed.
The criteria is that all the awards they've ever won are included. The ones with actual sections are the ones that "have been organized more than twice by either a government body or a media company [i.e. telvision and radio]. All other awards are shown in light blue." "All other awards" meaning ones that are currently sponsored or have been sponsored, and have had at least one iteration. Some sponsored awards have sections if the group won 4 or more total awards there. This "rule" is there to avoid having "one row wonders" for certain awards.

As for notability, there are a few iterations of the Singapore Hit Awards on Wikipedia, and the other awards inherit notability from their organizers. If anything, mention of the awards should probably stay on their respective organizers' pages. Pandacomics (talk) 19:04, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This link should help - [2]
- Yeah, funny. This is English Wikipedia by the way. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:34, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - I thought it was pretty damn brilliant. In any case, I've created a subpage with Google Translate translations (read: third-party, read: translations that are not mine) for 30 of the first 42 citations. If you want more translations, or want a specific source to be translated, I can run it through Google Translate for you. For those of you who can only understand English, I've even taken the liberty to make sure the translations are from Chinese to English. Pandacomics (talk) 22:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Converting the remainder to citeweb format. Pandacomics (talk) 18:37, 30 September 2008 (UTC)~~ Done. Pandacomics (talk) 15:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Would be good to have the final table left aligned instead of centered. And suggest rephrasing the opening sentence. The problem is not so much a distinction between awards and accolades as with the verb won. Accolades and awards are not synonymous: awards are won, but accolades may be informal praise which are earned or received. Winning implies formal competition. Since this is a list of awards rather than accolades, suggest either revising to include accolades (which would be difficult to do with completeness) or revising the lead sentence description. Durova^Charge! 20:52, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Hopefully it is a-ok. Pandacomics (talk) 23:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.