Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Dallas Buyers Club/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by SchroCat 11:53, 19 January 2015 [1].

List of accolades received by Dallas Buyers Club[edit]

Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Dallas Buyers Club/archive1

Nominator(s): Cowlibob (talk) 15:29, 1 January 2015 (UTC), and Earthh[reply]

Another one from my series on the most awarded 2013 films. This one for Dallas Buyers Club which saw Matthew McConaughey and Jared Leto sweep the majority of male acting awards that year. Before I worked on this, Earthh was the majority contributor so they have been added as co-nominator. As always, look forward to all the helpful comments. Cowlibob (talk) 15:29, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Krimuk90

Great job as always. Just three minor points:
"before giving it a wide release" can be changed to "before expanding it" to avoid repetition of the word "release".
In the sentence "Robin Mathews won for Best Makeup and Hairstyling, although she had a budget of only $250", the 'although' makes it seem like the low-budget was a bad thing. This may not be a major concern, but it think it will better if you can tweak this a bit.
Any way we can talk about the actors winning the Oscars without having to repeat the category, as the categories in which they were nominated are already mentioned in the previous sentence. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 13:16, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Krimuk90: Thanks for the review. I think I've fixed the above points. Cowlibob (talk) 23:51, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Well done! -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 07:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support! Cowlibob (talk) 12:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see no problem with the article. But, I think a note should be added to indicate that the "runner-ups" are considered wins in the list to clarify it to the readers.--FrankBoy _(Buzz) 12:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: I've added the note. Thanks for pointing it out. Cowlibob (talk) 17:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support: An excellent list! Cowlibob, you've done amazing job as always. Keep it up! --FrankBoy _(Buzz) 13:53, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments—

~~Last sentence of the third para and first sentence of the last para need references.~~

There is a 'Pending' cell in the table??

At "Central Ohio Film Critics Association", you have added two other films?

How is the list initially sorted?

~~Add an appropriate template at the end of the list~~

--Khadar Khani (talk) 17:09, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sahara4u: Added refs. Pending as it has been nominated but results will be announced next week which is a simple update. The win for Central Ohio was for his performance in all three films. List is alphabetical. No appropriate template exists at this time. Cowlibob (talk) 16:51, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support – meets the standards! Please have a look at my FLC nomination when you get some free time. --Khadar Khani (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. – SchroCat (talk) 12:07, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.