Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Sharon Stone/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Sharon Stone[edit]

List of awards and nominations received by Sharon Stone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Aoba47 (talk) 18:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the following is a list of honors and "dishonors" received by American actress Sharon Stone. It also includes information on her non-performance honors. I look forward to receiving everyone's feedback. Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 18:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Paparazzzi
  • The archived reference about the Emmy Awards does not support what is explained on the list; however, the original supports only what is on bold: "...recognizes excellence in the television industry, and corresponds to the Academy Award (for film), the Tony Award (for theatre), and the Grammy Award (for music)"
  • "The nominees are decided by MTV producers and executives; winners are decided online by the general public". Just a question, has always been that way?
  • I would assume that it was not done this way through the internet (as the award show was started in 1992). Aoba47 (talk) 00:35, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Change the present tense in the The Stinkers Bad Movie Awards section, because the award is not given anymore
@Aoba47:: These are my comments. When you addressed them, I will support. Paparazzzi (talk) 20:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Paparazzzi: Thank you for your review! I have addressed your comments. Aoba47 (talk) 00:35, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I support this nomination. Congrats, @Aoba47:! Paparazzzi (talk) 00:50, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 02:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from FrB.TG (talk) 18:55, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
;Comments
  • "Stone received a Chicago Film Critics Association Award, Golden Globe Award, and Saturn Award nominations for her performance as Catherine Tramell in Basic Instinct (1992)" I know this is supposed to be her awards list, but the fact that BI proved a breakthrough for her should be mentioned and then you can mention her wins/noms for the movie.
  • Revised and added a source. Aoba47 (talk) 23:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • We get it that she has an Emmy, so I think you should mention the category she won for The Practice otherwise it becomes just repetitive.
  • You might need to attach a source to the sentence about her role in the series.
  • I know that Golden Raspberry = generally negative reviews, but let's source the "her return to the character Tramell received negative critical reviews" part just to be on the safe side.
  • Added three sources and changed it to mixed as even though the movie received overwhelmingly negative reviews, Stone did receive some better responses for her performance from some. Aoba47 (talk) 23:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "non-performance honors. She has been honored" - honor in close proximity. To avoid the repetition, I would suggest to rephrase the Walk of Fame part; something like "She was inducted to the HWoF in 1995 for her contribution to film" might be better.
  • Could you possibly explain this part to me? I have always really bad with tables so I would greatly appreciate it. Aoba47 (talk) 23:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am talking about the grey shades in year; see Emma's awards list for further help.
Oh! Thank you for the clarification. I am not sure why I missed that. I have corrected this. Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 18:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do not like the current table's width - too big and the entries barely take 40% of the space. I would suggest to simply remove "width" from the tables and let them adjust accordingly or perhaps something like List of awards and nominations received by Emma Stone? Also, with 100% width, the extra space when you "show" the infobox in the first section looks awkward.
  • Revised using the format you pointed out in the Emma Stone list. Aoba47 (talk) 23:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The Golden Raspberry Award, often referred to simply as the "Razzies", is an annual award show to "recognize" the worst performances in film." Unnecessary IMO (the parts I have stricken through).
  • I think that you need to link Casino only in the Academy Awards section and not the subsequent ones. The same applies to other films.
  • I actually used the same format from List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence (that was actually my guide when creating this list). I am assuming that he or she did it that way so that a reader going to each individual section can have a WikiLink without the need to scroll up, but I can still remove the links if you feel that is necessary. Aoba47 (talk) 23:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't feel strongly about either of them so up to you. I for one have done the opposite of Lawrence's awards list but I guess it is all based on preference.
Thank you. I only did that way as I was modeling it after the Jennifer Lawrence list and I have not had much exposure to these kinds of lists in the past. I wish that this sort of thing was standardized though in the future to prevent problems like this. Aoba47 (talk) 18:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Stone has also been awarded honors" - I would get rid of "honors".
  • Is the "traveled to Israel to promote peace in the Middle East through" necessary in the list? I don't see an accolade awarded in recognition of her work in the Middle East. Am I missing something here?
  • It is in the "Other honors" section. It is the following line: (In March 2006, Stone traveled to Israel to promote peace in the Middle East through a press conference with Nobel Peace Prize winner Shimon Peres.)
I know where it is located. What I am asking is whether it is relevant since no award has been given to her regarding her work in the Middle East—the section is titled "Other honors" not "Other work". – FrB.TG (talk) 14:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@FrB.TG: I have removed the information from both the lead and the body of the article. Aoba47 (talk) 16:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is an error in ref 26; it takes you nowhere when you click on it. Also, you need a page number.
  • Fixed the link. I found the resource in Google Books here and for some reason, it does not have any page numbers so I am not sure what to do about this. Aoba47 (talk) 23:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reference 28 and 29 have no links. Is there a way to confirm her nominations?
  • Unfortunately, I simply could not find sources for several of the nominations; since I could not find a source, I cited the ceremony directly. I have seen this done on other featured lists such as List of awards and nominations received by Vidya Balan in references 22-24. I am not sure what else I can do as I do not think there are any sources out there for these. Aoba47 (talk) 23:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To say that the method applied at Vidya's list is incorrect would make me sound like a complete hypocrite since I have written that list. @WP:FLC director and delegates: ? – FrB.TG (talk) 14:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@FrB.TG: Thank you for your response. If needed, I can try to locate some sources to support these nominations. Aoba47 (talk) 18:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That would be great, much better than having a reference that goes nowhere. – FrB.TG (talk) 14:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@FrB.TG: The problem is that I cannot find a reference for the above nominations. I have looked very careful for something, but found nothing so I think this is the only way to cite them to be perfectly honest. I did the citation this way as it already been done on a featured list so I would assume that means this method has been deemed permissible. Aoba47 (talk) 16:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref 33-35, 37, 43-46; ditto. – FrB.TG (talk) 20:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: Thank you for your review. I have been working on a lot of different list types to try and familiarize myself with everything. I have addressed your comments and look forward to hearing back from you. Aoba47 (talk) 23:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: Any updates on this? Aoba47 (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@FrB.TG: I have responded to your above comments. I am not sure what else to do about the sourcing as I feel that it is the only way to cite these nominations given the lack of online resources about them. Aoba47 (talk) 21:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: all of my comments have been taken care of. I am still unsure about those 10 references (nr# 28, 29, 33-35, 37, 43-46) that have no links and I also understand that there is nothing we can do about it (I have been through this myself multiple times). I shall leave it on the source reviewer. Other than that issue, it is a fine piece of work. – FrB.TG (talk) 18:55, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Aoba47 (talk) 19:18, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support I don't notice anything major. Very nice work. MCMLXXXIX 20:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support this list, just one thing to say. Add one or two external links. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Yashthepunisher: Thank you for your support, but "awards and nominations" lists do not typically use external links. Aoba47 (talk) 16:21, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 14:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • If "Los YoGa Awards" is not notable enough for an article, why would they be notable enough to be listed here?
  • Similar applies to all other Wikipedia-non-notable awards.
  • "She has been inducted" why not just "She was..."?
  • "... into two categories - the International ..." fix spaced hyphens per WP:DASH.
  • Refs for first two Golden Globes are formatted differently from the rest.
  • "Stone has received three awards from nine nominations." looks like 10 noms to me.
  • "Hollywood Film Festival" or "Hollywood Film Awards"?
  • "Stone has two awards from seven nominations." looks like 6 noms to me.
  • " two awards out of eight nominations." looks like 9 noms to me.
  • "dignitaries. She gained enough pledges" merge, "dignitaries, gaining enough pledges"
  • Notes d and e lack refs.

The Rambling Man (talk) 12:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @The Rambling Man: Thank you for your comments! I have responded to all of them. Let me know if there is anything else that I can do to improve this list. Aoba47 (talk) 14:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I made one change for consistency. Great work. Carbrera (talk) 00:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Source Review

Nothing too objectionable, though a couple of points regarding formatting:

  • While Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies) is a little vague, typically you do not include incorporation marks (LLC, Inc, Co., etc.) in the names of companies in text or references like you're doing for some of the publishers- so ref. 2 would be "Tronc", not "Tronc, Inc."
  • Also, typically you don't include the publisher in a reference if it's just the same as the work, or very similar- so "New York. New York Media." would just be "New York" in ref. 5. You're actually inconsistent with this- ref 16 is missing a publisher (Guardian Media Group), but you have it for other newspapers that publish themselves.
  • Removed "New York Media" and added Guardian Media Group with a link. Aoba47 (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Either link the first instance of a work/publisher or all of them- you link Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in refs 6 and 7, and Hastings Bad Cinema Society in refs 34-36, but then only link Hollywood Foreign Press Association in ref 10 and not the next 4 refs.
  • Linked all of the references to Hollywood Foreign Press Association. Aoba47 (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for archiving your online sources. I agree that you don't need access dates if you do that.
  • Thank you! I tried my best with this for all of my articles/lists. Aoba47 (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Man, citing the award ceremony is definitely sketchy. I know the precedent has been set before, but I'm still not 100% about it. Wish the minor award groups would just put up a website with some ugly lists with the information and call it a day.
  • I completely agree and I do admit that it is very sketchy indeed. If this prevents the list from passing as a FLC, then I completely understand and can try to dig even deeper to find resources that cover the information. I just have not had any luck with my previous searches. Aoba47 (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Movies for Grownups® Gala" - remove the trade mark in ref 53
  • Oops, that is embarrassing. Removed the trade mark. Aoba47 (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's all, spotchecks showed no problems. --PresN 21:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @PresN: Thank you for your review! I greatly appreciate it. I have addressed all of your comments. Let me know if there is anything else that I can do to improve the list. Aoba47 (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A couple more:
  • Ref 2 was an example, you also have them in ref 18 and 23
  • The works in 41-44 should probably link to Chicago Film Critics Association- or better yet, have that as the publisher like you do for the Stinker awards in 34-36
  • Missed this the first time- in ref 4, you have the website non-italicized and with a capital first letter, but the opposite in ref 58. --PresN 21:53, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @PresN: Thank you for the further comments. I have addressed your above comments. Aoba47 (talk) 23:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, passing. --PresN 02:07, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Sharon_Stone/archive1&oldid=1141921060"