Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of dinosaurs

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of dinosaurs[edit]

Preivously denied featured status, but the team has put together some great work on this article to make it look special. Now all links are blue, & thanks to me, it now have roughly 1 or 2 pictures per letter, except for ones with no pictures, like x etc. Basically nothing really starts with x, but that's beside the point. I hope you find it in your hearts to support this list make from the blood & sweat of so many html programmers. Thanks, Spawn Man 03:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nominator Support - As per above. Spawn Man 03:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support yes - lots of good work has made a fine (possibly unique) reference article. - Ballista 05:32, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, great work. —Nightstallion (?) 07:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Could we get a link to its previous nomination? Rmhermen 19:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Making Wikipedia unique, all the way. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 10:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. A great and unique list but I don't like the choice of pictures. Many of them depict obsolete representations and fragments of bones. Is this because we don't have dino pictures? CG 10:37, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well... basically yes. Although all links are blue, very few have photos or pictures. I feel that the pictures are a good respresentative of different dinosaurs & different styles from different periods. You can't tell me those old pictures are interesting; the way we view & construct dinosaurs has varied greatly. And considering that all dinosaurs we find are from fossils or "fragments of bones", I feel that those pictures are okay? Thanks for you support - Spawn Man 00:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I haven't been able to find a single non-listed dinosaur in that entry. Even the bloody Neovenator is there. It's about as comprehensive as it can get; it's even annotated. - Mgm|(talk) 10:26, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as per Mgm. --Arctic Gnome 00:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, my god, we have an unbelievably amount of dinasour articles... :) NCurse work 15:09, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support One of the best lists I've ever seen. That's a lot of dinosaurs, but not a single red link! --Thelb4 13:39, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support, although I freely admit I'm not a neutral party in this: I turned 530 of those links blue. :) Firsfron of Ronchester 16:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Durova 20:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_dinosaurs&oldid=1089077533"