Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Simon & Garfunkel discography/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by Giants2008 21:05, 12 June 2011 [1].

---

Simon & Garfunkel discography

Simon & Garfunkel discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/Simon & Garfunkel discography/archive1
• Featured list candidates/Simon & Garfunkel discography/archive2

Nominator(s): ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 18:31, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the criteria, after a copy-edit of the lead by a friendly wikipedian. ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 18:31, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Quick comments Please make sure lead and infobox match for figures. corrected Debut album redirects to album so that's pointless. delinked "he re-released version" of the album or the single? The album, because it charted on Billboard 200 and UK Album Chart "of the eponymous single" not sure that's used in the right context. why not? "a platinum certification " vs " 3× Multi-Platinum by" prefer the first version (i.e. write as prose). ok done Check other parts of the lead for this. checked Two dab links (single, Tom Wilson). no more dab links Collected Works (according to your link) was released Jan 26, 1990.. Not quite what you have in this table... yes it was re-released in 1990 according to allmusic. Directly cite works that never charted please. ok done The Rambling Man (talk) 16:29, 9 May 2011 (UTC) --♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 17:07, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Giants2008 (27 and counting) 20:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments – Two links to the group in the first two sentences is a bit of overkill to me, as does linking the United States and New York City. These are common terms and people already know what they are; they don't need to click on a link to find out. done "and received a eight-time multi-platinum in the US." I think "and received eight-times", like what appears earlier in the lead, would read better. done If I'm not mistaken, the New Zealand Herald is a newspaper. If so, it needs italics as the publisher of reference 4. done

• Are page numbers avaliable for reference 11 (the Finnish book)? If so, provide them. Also, if the content of the book is in Finnish, there should be a note indicating that in the cite, like in several other references.

asked

• What makes refs 43 to 46 reliable sources?

ref 43 is ultimatelly reliable; it has screenshots of the vinyl records, how is it not reliable? Ref 44 is also reliable, as the information about the releases has been collected by several magazines, books and newspapers; see below. Don't know what happened with ref 45, so I removed it. I am not sure about ref 46; it seems like it is a thrustworthy textfile (with several appearances in other sites), which includes the e mail of the author and a copyright statement.

Will leave this unstruck so that other reviewers can offer comments if they want to. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 20:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

• Pretty sure we shouldn't be linking to MySpace even as an external link. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 15:30, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

done--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 17:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.