Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/User:Antandrus/observations on Wikipedia behavior

Nominator(s): Rambo's Revenge (How am I doing?)

I am nominating this because I believe it is a useful and informative list which meets all of WP:FL?. Rambo's Revenge (How am I doing?) 00:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This should be nominated for WP:AFD... KV5 (Talk • Phils) 00:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delist/delete/strong something-or-other

It should begin "This is a list of observations on Wikipedia behavior" per usual standards. If not, it should begin "This is a timeline of the awards and nominations won by series 2 of the discography of the Nobel-laureate-winning USMA alumni of Jesus College, Oxford who were starting pitchers at third base for Aston Villa", which should ensure it gets enough support votes to pass.
Bullet numbers 11 to 71 inclusive (odd numbers only) should be in words, not figures, per MOS:MADEITUP
The list should be merged somewhere else, such as The O.C. (season 1)
It needs a proper Lead
Is William Blake a reliable source?
Needs some fair-use images to review.

--Bencherlite ^Talk 01:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick promote Because it's the best that we have to offer on the subject. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)

Breaches MOS per WP:OVERLINK, I can't read the article for all the blue.
"Wikipedia is an encyclopedia." Doesn't have a source.
What makes the Bible a reliable source?
List is not sorted by alphabetic order of the second letter of the second word of the second line of each listed item.
Violates list naming conventions in lack of "List of" and should therefore be speedily deleted.
Entire list breaches the single most important policy on Wikipedia. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this nefarious list and ban the author. Then inaugurate a new Wikipedia:Featured Banned Users and promote the author there; goodness knows he's promoted himself enough elsewhere. Antandrus (talk) 02:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"As soon as someone attacks the community, or any portion of it, by writing a rant on their user page, Act V of their Wiki Tragedy has begun. It will end, inevitably, with their departure or expulsion from the project."
- Should I be woried now? -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 03:16, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Too long; didn't read. Should be trimmed to no more than 50-75 letters; then we'll talk. Meanwhile, delete.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:02, April 1, 2009 (UTC)

Promote per No. 71 and AS A PROTEST AGAINST CENSORSHIP AND ADMINISTRATOR ABUSE. Actually, seriously, promote author to "featured contributor". --RobertG ♬ talk 16:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]