Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Woody Harrelson filmography/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Woody Harrelson filmography[edit]

Featured list candidates/Woody Harrelson filmography/archive1

Nominator(s): ~ HAL 333 04:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prior to working on this, I wasn't aware of how prolific an actor Harrelson is. I hope this serves as a comprehensive and informative list. Thanks! ~ HAL 333 04:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

;Comments on the lead

Literally the only thing I have on the lead is that "In 2021, Harrelson will portray Cletus Kasady (i.e. Carnage)" looks a bit odd with the use of "ie". I think it would be better as "In 2021, Harrelson will portray Cletus Kasady a.k.a. Carnage". I will look at the table later....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I changed that to a.k.a. ~ HAL 333 22:51, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comments on the tables

Any title that starts with "A" or "The" should sort based on the next word in the title
If you sort the year column in descending order (newest to oldest) the "TBA" row goes to the bottom. It should go to the top, so you probably need to use a hidden sort template to make it sort as if it were 2021 or 2022.
That's it :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisTheDude All done. ~ HAL 333 16:48, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comments on the refs

Check that the ref title shown here is the actual title. The title shown for ref 1, for example, is "Woody Harrelson Emmy Nominated", but the actual title of the source is simply "Woody Harrelson".
Do not show ref titles in all caps, even if that is how they are stylised in the actual source.
That's it -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisTheDude

Gladly done. ~ HAL 333 22:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — But consider archiving sources (WP:PLRT). ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 15:17, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CAPTAIN MEDUSA Thanks for the advice. I'm in the process of doing it, but it'll take a while. ~ HAL333 03:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CAPTAIN MEDUSA

Done Just for future reference, is there a bot that I can assign to do that? ~ HAL333 05:31, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HAL333, use this tool. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

Support. All the images are appropriate to the subject and properly-licensed. They fulfill the "5b)Visual appeal" criteria. Shearonink (talk) 21:47, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I cannot find anything to complain about in the text so I support in general, but am I being too picky by saying that only the top pic mentions a performance and the 1996 pic is not great quality? If there are no better pics you could ask the graphics workshop if they could improve the 1996 pic as the expressions on the guys faces and their gestures are great, but would it be possible to see them more clearly without overexposing the background? Chidgk1 (talk) 15:41, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just decided to remove the 1996 pic. ~ HAL333 23:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chidgk1 I added another image. Did you notice anything else? ~ HAL333 17:56, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --- Chidgk1 (talk) 07:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; promoting. --Pres N 03:50, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.