Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Manchester United F.C. players/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was kept by Dabomb87 21:48, 14 April 2010 [1].

List of Manchester United F.C. players[edit]

List of Manchester United F.C. players (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox

Notified: User:PeeJay2K3, WP:FOOTBALL

I fell across this list on some research, it doesn't have:

  • Sources
  • A sortable table
  • Captain section need emdashes
  • Inclusion criteria is not stringent as players with 'a notable contribution' are also included, but nowhere is it explained what that is.

Sandman888 (talk) 09:34, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 07:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments per a note on your talkpage, notify significant contributor(s) and relevant wikiprojects about this nomination please.
  • Two general sources, one of which is a primary source, does seem very slim these days.
    • Regarding the improvement of sources, are you saying that I need to add a reference to every row in the table? It's possible that I can do that, but it will take a while.
      • I think that's perceived these days as the thing to do. You currently have to go searching in a primary source for a reference using that first general reference. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:34, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The table could be sortable as long as the "Apps (Sub)" and "Total" rows are above the "Appearances" cell. Then you'd be in the same boat as List of India women Test cricketers for instance where a colspan doesn't have to wreck sortability. Then, of course, names would need to use {{sortname}} and other cols would have to be checked that they sort fine or else the {{SortKey}} template should be used.
    • Done.
  • The Captain section needs the table to be completed. Per the suggestion, em-dashes could/should be used for empty cells.
    • The source I used for the "Captains" table had some gaps in it, so I have emailed Manchester United's museum curator to ask him if he can provide a more complete list. As for the emdashes, where do you suggest they be placed? If you are suggesting that they go in the empty cells in the "Notes" column, I find that to be a little silly.
      • It's just the idea of empty cells (and I'd suggest one per row rather than the rowspans you current have) isn't wonderful. And I would think it possible to provide notes about some if not all of the captains. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:34, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd agree that "significant contributions to the club's history" is very nebulous and needs more objective (and defined) criteria.
    • I also agree with this. In fact, I started a discussion on the article's talk page about this very issue. Either we need to completely remove any players with less than 100 appearances or the criteria for "significant contributions" needs defining, which would lead to more players being added.
      • Since there are only two candidates for the chop, I'd axe them and the whole subjectivity falls away. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:34, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The lead could be expanded so that it doesn't just stand as a very bland list of factoids about the list itself, rather it discusses players on the list e.g. most appearances, most as a goalkeeper, most goals scored, most games captained etc.

The Rambling Man (talk) 20:21, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    • Can do. This shouldn't be too hard. – PeeJay 12:29, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on sourcing

  • Personally, I'd have been happy with a general reference to the player menu page at StretfordEnd.co.uk, with specific refs only where their StretfordEnd stats differed from the list. I'm seriously impressed that you've referenced every row. I might have argued against that being necessary, by analogy with FLs not being expected to supply individual page numbers for stats from a book source. However, you do still need refs for early players' appearances in matches not covered by their StretfordEnd page.
    • I assume you're talking specifically about the entries for Alf Farman and Willie Stewart (there may be more, I just haven't found them yet). I'll try to corroborate the figures given in the list with my copy of "The Definitive Newton Heath". – PeeJay 22:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • You've presumably now gone along with the club's view that appearances in the Football Alliance were not 'competitive'? I have no problem with that, but just to satisfy my own curiosity, do you happen to know why the club takes that view? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • To be honest, I have no idea. I do have a reference for the club's line-ups in Football Alliance matches, so I could have worked out which other players made more than 100 appearances with that competition included, but it would have been quite a lot of work and I didn't fancy risking someone pulling me up on the grounds of original research. – PeeJay 18:28, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
          • No, you're probably right. StretfordEnd have all the apps and goals by season, but they don't count them in the totals on the player pages. The Birmingham player list was sourced from the "Complete Record" book, where each player's total of appearances included the Football Alliance apps, except for a few where it didn't, which was terminally unhelpful..... cheers, Struway2 (talk) 18:45, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Captains list needs some sort of general ref, and those individual notes not ref'd by the list itself (e.g. Keane's most trophies, Byrne's death...) need sources. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 22:37, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm just waiting to hear back from the curator of the Man Utd museum. I'm hoping to get my hands on copies of information sheets produced by the club that I will hopefully be able to use to reference the captains. – PeeJay 22:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • I have now received copies of the club's information sheets and used them to fill out the Captains section. – PeeJay 21:29, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • Captain section could use a lead to provide background information
    • Done.
  • Key - what's a utility player?
    • I have added a note to the article.
  • It's plain games and goals, it would be nice to have information on records and so on; just like there's a notes column for the Captains Sandman888 (talk) 12:42, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (27 and counting) 21:04, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
  • The lead is still a little thin, as has been noted above. List of Arsenal F.C. players, a list I nommed here once upon a time, has a serviceable lead that could serve as a model of sorts.
    • I have now updated the lead to be a bit more interesting. I think it should be satisfactory now.
  • In the Ryan Giggs photo, the bit about him scoring in each season needs a cite.
    • Done.
  • The reference column doesn't need to be sortable.
    • Done.
  • The Manchester United F.C. category could be removed, as it is the parent category of the players one. They probably aren't both needed. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 23:20, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm not sure I agree with this. As one of the core articles of the Manchester United F.C. topic, it seems appropriate to me that this article should be in Category:Manchester United F.C. – PeeJay 21:29, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Comment

  • One thing I spotted in the captains section... although I appreciate the point being made (that Gary Neville is a local lad and that this is now a rare thing), Greater Manchester did not exist when Dennis Viollet was born, or indeed when he played, so is it a valid comparison to make? --Jameboy (talk) 01:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Greater Manchester may not have existed back when Viollet was playing, but I do believe that the comparison is valid. However, the wording could possibly be improved. Does anyone have any suggestions? – PeeJay 21:29, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • When I looked at where all the captains were born, there were actually surprisingly few from the area now called Greater Manchester, so I don't think it is that significant. Therefore my only suggestion would be to remove the text in question. --Jameboy (talk) 14:47, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is still unclear what is the source in the Captain section. Otherwise a good job. Sandman888 (talk) 08:24, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • The source is an official information sheet created and provided by the Manchester United Museum. – PeeJay 09:37, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • Are the notes section also referenced there? Sandman888 (talk) 10:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • Oh yes, good point. For the notes that are not based on simple arithmetic, I will try to find references. – PeeJay 12:47, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
          • What's the status on this? Dabomb87 (talk) 05:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
            • Please accept my apologies, I'd forgotten about this. Sort of in the middle of a drive to get Manchester United F.C. to FA status, so my attentions were elsewhere. Anyway, I've now referenced all of the statements that seemed to require it. – PeeJay 14:47, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - nice job. I'd prefer I've you moved the Captain source down under references, it wd make it clearer, e.g.:

Club captains

[ref] Sandman888 (talk) 22:16, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_removal_candidates/List_of_Manchester_United_F.C._players/archive1&oldid=1089075451"