Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aquila spinogaster

African Hawk Eagle[edit]

An excellent image, which I think meets all the criteria. Used (to little effect in the taxobox) in the species article and in the article on bird flight. Also demonstrates the excellent free content that can be found on flickr.

Nominate and support --Peta 04:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good photo, I'm a little disappointed with the legs cut off. Is there a way to get them? --Will Mak 050389 04:56, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose primarily due to the subject being cut off at the bottom of the frame, and the tight framing / cropping at left and right.-- Moondigger 05:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cutting the legs off wrecks the picture - Adrian Pingstone 07:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Subject unfortunately cut off, so it's not encyclopedic enough in my opinion. --mstroeck 09:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose regretfully, due to cut off legs. HighInBC 13:29, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. It's so sad to see opposes because there is one thing wrong with an otherwise featured picture. I think this image could do good in showing the wing, but of course, as everyone else has said, the full animal isn't shown, so I'm neutral. --Tewy 01:59, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose His legs are not in the picture, and he is too far in the bottom right corner. Dinosaur puppy 01:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Very, very, reluctant oppose. The legs and tail are cropped off.--JyriL ^talk 22:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Mikeo 00:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]