Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bald Eagle

Reason: High resolution, good contrast and color balance, is one of Wikipedia's finest images of the Bald Eagle
Articles this image appears in: Bald Eagle, Ventana Wildlife Society
Creator: Jörg Hempel

Support either as nominator --Samwb123^T-C-@ 05:42, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose original. Looks a bit dark, probably overshadowed. Brand[t] 14:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. An impressive specimen but the colors are missing a certain vibrancy. anon -20091203060217 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chsh (talk • contribs) 06:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Good detail, interesting subject; nice bokeh too. NotFromUtrecht (talk) 18:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Brand -- mcshadypl ^T ^C 23:34, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 1. Looks fine now. Brand[t] 18:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 1. Good now. -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 15:34, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This will be a very ironic example of FP inconsistency, after so many FP nominations have been opposed, and in consequence not promoted, for not including the whole body of the animal. Elekhh (talk) 08:18, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- We do have numerous animal 'portraits', but I'd suggest a bigger concern is that we have such a similar existing FP . This should really have been done as a delist and replace. --jjron (talk) 12:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above.--Caspian blue 02:00, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 23:04, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]