Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Boxer Codex

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2014 at 11:44:47 (UTC)

Reason: Best image available from the text, the Boxer Codex, a late 16th century art book.
Articles in which this image appears: Boxer Codex, Filipino People, History of the Philippines
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Philipandrew

Support as nominator --Theparties (talk) 11:44, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support, certainly most educational and encyclopedic. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 12:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support,--In the name effort and Art — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.6.181.198 (talk) 08:20, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Visible JPG artefacting, looks like it was cleaned but ... definitely digital manipulation (that font at the bottom... no way it's a 16th century font) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:26, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, priestess is spelled incorrectly. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:29, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose- I have no idea what the "chart" was created for, when it was created or why. The original images of the Boxer Codex, as they appear on the article's page, are beautiful and interesting. This image, combining figures from the codex, is far less valuable than the codex illustrations themselves. Amandajm (talk) 02:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, for the weird text. J Milburn (talk) 23:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]