Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/C-class Melbourne tram

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

C-class Melbourne tram[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2014 at 08:22:56 (UTC)

Original – The C-class trams are three-section Citadis 202 trams built by Alstom, France that operate on the Melbourne tram network. They were the first low-floor trams in Melbourne.
Reason
High EV for at least two articles and very good composition.
Articles in which this image appears
C-class Melbourne tram, Melbourne tram route 109 (and 4 more)
FP category for this image
Vehicles/Land
Creator
Diliff
  • Support as nominator --ELEKHHT 08:22, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Slightly hesitant Support - Colours seem a bit weird, but then, Australian sunny days are a lot sunnier than ours in Scotland. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nominator. Tomer T (talk) 09:12, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support Not very weird looking color to me but there is something not very flattering about the image. Since I cannot put my finger on it I can't say I oppose for any particular reason and don't feel neutral enough to say such. Support as being unable to see anything wrong.--Mark Miller (talk) 04:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Don't see any major issues with color. A bit of warming may help, but I trust Diliff's editing skills here. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I don't think there's anything wrong with the colours either. Skies are just deep blue sometimes. The colour balance seems about right to me, as evidenced by the white tram's sun-facing front being white (if the image was too cool, the whites would be blue-tinted). The tram's side is slightly blue because it isn't receiving direct sunlight, only the reflected blue light from the sky. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 10:29, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:C Class Tram, Melbourne - Jan 2008.jpg --The Bushranger One ping only 08:28, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]