Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Honey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Honey[edit]

A jar of honey, shown with a wooden honey server and scones.
Reason
I think this is a great picture, and I'm surprised it's not featured yet.
Articles this image appears in
Honey, Soul food, Scone (bread), Biscuit, Cuisine of the Southern United States
Creator
Scott Bauer
Nominator
Tomer T
  • SupportTomer T 21:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, sorry but I think a FP of "Honey" should also include honeycomb and maybe a bee or two. Though it is a fine pic, it doesn't represent "all" of the idea of Honey for me. Witty lama 21:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • I think there can be a featured picture of honey related to it as a food and one related to its natural form. Tomer T 23:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Depicts honey exactly as it comes to one's mind.--Orthologist 21:53, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unless you've ever had raw honey, in which case, you'll never think of this kind of picture as "real" honey again.--ragesoss 23:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, per Witty lama.--ragesoss 23:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Needs to be cleaned up. ~ trialsanderrors 00:44, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, per Ragesoss. -- 8thstar 18:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Technically and aesthetically reminiscent of a 1970's cook-book. Also per Witty lama. mikaul 18:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - the remarks about the image not simultaneously representing every different form of honey are just silly. Would we reject a photo of an animal because we can't simultaneously see front, back, underside, male, female, young, mating, dead, etc? This is obviously a very useful photo that illustrates honey - even at thumbnail size. The honey article has plenty of space to have different photos representing different aspects of the subject. One photo doesn't need to do it all. Stevage 05:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I hope this nomination is a joke. It's not interesting at all.--Svetovid 21:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • That's a matter of opinion Tomer T 02:04, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 11:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]