Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hoover Dam Panorama

Hoover Dam Panorama[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2011 at 21:40:28 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dusty777 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Good EV, good view of multiple features of the dam, good resolution, informative caption.
Articles in which this image appears: Hoover Dam
FP category for this image: Featured pictures/Places/Others
Creator: Kuczora

Support as nominator --Dusty777 (talk) 21:40, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose as is~~ A restitch might fix it. There are dust spots in the air, and the verticals are not vertical. JJ Harrison (talk) 23:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point out to me where the verticals are not vertical? It'll give me a better idea of what your looking at. Dusty777 (talk) 00:39, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The water intake tower things are one such example. JJ Harrison (talk) 02:24, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

now Support. Dust spots removed + small vertical correction on the left. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:26, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I removed some more dust-spots from Alchemists version, then re-uploaded as Alt-1. Dusty777 (talk) 17:53, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ Support Original, Oppose Alt-1. Alternative suffers from too high compression. O.J. (talk) 13:32, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- On second thought, there are no serious problems with the original. O.J. (talk) 10:12, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Original JJ Harrison (talk) 11:26, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does that mean the original oppose can be stricken? Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:20, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. JJ Harrison (talk) 12:01, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 21:39, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]