Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Kremlin Cathedrals

Kremlin Cathedrals[edit]

This is the first time I am attempting to have one of my pictures become featured. Cathedrals and golden domes, I tried to catch them all in the same picture. I am looking forward to hear the critics in order to improve my future picture editing skills.

Nominate and support. - Hús ö nd 22:32, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support This is a nice photo, but the spires are (IMHO) too shiny. Although I'm not an expert editor, perhaps darkening the image might help? AndonicO 23:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose The domes have poor contrast with the sky. The composition is framed poorly, with a chunk of the building sticking out stage left. The people in the foreground add nothing to the depiction of the building. This seems like a standard tourist photo. (aside; I've been to this site myself, 10 years ago. Much better photos are possible). --Bridgecross 00:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Bridgecross HighInBC 01:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not featured quality. Hardly any contrast between the spires and the sky. Bad composition. Mikeo 08:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's hard to get them all in the picture, especially now that Ivan's Bell Tower is under construction. However, there are better images of the Kremlin available. InvictaHOG 15:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Good effort, but ultimately I don't think it was quite successful enough for FP. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 17:12, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not better than a postcard Aye-Aye 21:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because of blurness and lack of sharpness. --Ineffable3000 23:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Bridgecross. Nauticashades 09:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per everyone. Just too blurry. Staxringold _talk^contribs 15:34, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 04:14, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]