Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Predrag Miletić

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Actor[edit]

Original - Predrag Miletić, actor of the National Theatre in Belgrade, Serbia
Reason
It brings balanced view of the man, and also shows some of his character. Love the lighting, and arm in the foreground. If needed, bigger photo may be uploaded.
Articles in which this image appears
Predrag Miletić
Creator
Tadija
  • Support as nominator --Tadija (talk) 22:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment There's no source listed on the image description page, did you take this photograph? Jujutacular T · C 00:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • But i did, you have all of that on commons page. ([1]) --Tadija (talk)
  • I see now, thanks. I was looking at the version that was still on Wikipedia. Jujutacular T · C 14:57, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Is there a particular reason this is in greyscale? Yeah, it's very arty, but it's not generally that encyclopedic... J Milburn (talk) 01:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well no, it was just wished like that. I have similar photos in color, this one is only grayscale. --Tadija (talk)
  • Is there a reason you consider the greyscale more encyclopedic than the colour? J Milburn (talk) 14:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, J Milburn, really, nothing special, just it could be interesting as person is actor, so it can be encyclopedic per man's occupation. I will never add portrait of some politician or scientist in grayscale. But this is ok. Also, i hope that this is not problem for nomination? :) :)
  • Oppose. The hand is just too large and dominant, taking up most of the foreground and being larger than the face. A little bit of hand would be fine - I've seen plenty of portraits where hands or other body parts add expression - but too much hand is problematic. Mostlyharmless (talk) 22:29, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I like this shot, it strikes me as technically good and it is nicely dynamic. Sabine's Sunbird talk 01:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The picture is original and looks just great. FkpCascais (talk) 04:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Colour is more encyclopaedic and I'm not a fan of the perspective effect for article illustration. Noodle snacks (talk) 08:36, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Hand is ginormous and distracting. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 03:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]