Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Red-and-green Macaw at Apenheul Primate Park, Netherlands

Support as nominator --Snowman (talk) 23:33, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Good image, but the beak is blowned (over-exposed) and there is red fringing at the top edge of the head. Also some stripe artifacts, if I'm not mistaken. Additionally it isn't crisp enough and the red colors are washed out near the brighter parts. --Zoo Fari 00:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, leaning towards support. It's not technically perfect, but I do love the composition, and I think it serves as a great lead image. However, as a fairly common and iconic bird (in every zoo and common as pets) I do feel we can hope for a stronger image. J Milburn (talk) 01:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The trouble is there are relatively few images showing the full length of the bird. However, I see what you mean. Snowman (talk) 12:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Snowman (talk) 12:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 05:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator. Makeemlighter (talk) 05:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]