Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Wadi Rum images

The image:

is of high quality (if we neglect the slight noise, which I don't this is a problem here)
is of high resolution
it looks very good, and presents the great natural qualities of wadi rum.

Article it appears in: Wadi Rum (there are other nice pictures there).

Note: no the image isn't tilted, the right portion of the land is "hill shaped".

Nominate and support. - Eshcorp 16:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Hm, a double nomination, I'd support the panoramic (but might have a tilt judging from the far sand-mountain transition line). Pic 2 doesn't do it for me. So if the question was FP status for both, then I'll have to oppose. --Dschwen 16:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC). Upon close examination I reconsider my opinion on this image. I must have been blind not to notice the prominent stitching faults in the center of the image. Sorry, but for me this disqualifies a pano as an FP. --Dschwen 11:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~Oppose ~~Two images should really have two seperate nominations, I have seperate opinions of each one.~~ Per stitching faults. HighInBC 14:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have seperated the nominations. --Eshcorp 17:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - stiching is readily detectable as areas of detail duplication. Debivort 17:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Debivort. —Jared Hunt September 4, 2006, 17:46 (UTC)
Weak oppose. Per above opposes, and it looks oversharpened on the left. Otherwise it's good. --Tewy 18:04, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Per Debivort and Tewy. I also don't find it that interesting. Nauticashades 17:43, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Mikeo 22:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]