Support.--Absar 11:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If this is a nomination would the nominator write why this can be a FP, does it meet the criteria and write their reason(s) for nominating the article. feydey 14:14, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - does not meet the criteria. Shyam(T/C) 20:25, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose. This isn't even getting close.
No image credits, and a rather stubby image prose.
No suggestion pages.
The news section is a mess and requires a rewrite.
The "Selected article" section goes by far more than just summarizing the topic.
Image frames.
"Things to do" not formatted properly.
"Other portals" section is empty.
Excessive images and quotes at the intruduction.
I don't feel that there is any need to go on, please withdraw this and refer to portal peer review instead. Michaelas10(Talk) 11:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
