Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Death Has a Shadow/1

Death Has a Shadow

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delist. Sourcing and image concerns remain unaddressed. Geometry guy 22:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

The prose in the article needs work, and a lot of the production applies to the series as a whole rather than this specific episode. The original GA nomination was reviewed by a user who is part of the Family Guy project (showing a possible conflict of interests), and who had made large additions to the article a week before the review (which is against the rules). As well, the review was not in-depth at all (merely two minor comments). I think it would be appropriate for community members to reassess the article for GA. Ωphois 21:08, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

User:Pedro thy master(note:i participated in various activites on the proyect and on the artical, i am also who reviewed it's GA and then nominated it for FLC) I put this in case that any useres have questions about who was it, also that i may be in the conversation--Saint Pedrolas J. ^{Hohohohohoh merry christmas} 21:58, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

• I think if the article at the very least is reverted back to the originally reviewed version of the article, it would be an improvement over the copy/paste article that Pedro has tried to pass off as "up to snuff" for an FA nomination. Most, if not all, of the lead is simply copy and paste, something that I attempted and succeeded to clean up in the article as a whole before originally nominating it as a GA candidate back in October. Gage (talk) 01:08, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

  What do you mean by "copy/paste"? Geometry guy 22:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

• Comment. Awadewit has reviewed the article here. Her comments under "Images" and "Sources" concern GA criteria. These need to be addressed for the article to remain a GA. Geometry guy 22:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)