Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Homeopathy/1

Homeopathy[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review • Previous GAR

Result: Procedural close. Nominator blocked. Any other editor is welcome to nominate the article for reassessment if they believe it does not meet the criteria. Geometry guy 22:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article was nominated for being a Featured Article, but a lot of people opposed it. I now oppose it being a Good Article as well, for the same reasons-mainly because every sentence/statement is criticised and no defense is being allowed.-NootherIDAvailable (talk) 02:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FA discussion can be seen here. Brunton (talk) 07:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
NootherIDAvailable, can you explain with reference to the good article criteria why this article should be delisted? Geometry guy 17:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I agree with Geometry guy (talk · contribs). More specific comments from the GAR nominator regarding WP:WIAGA would be helpful here. Cirt (talk) 20:55, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]