Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/IPad/1

iPad[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Result: kept

I am requesting a reassessment of iPad. The iPad article is good but I think that a reassesement is necessary. ~~Awsome EBE123 ^talk_Contribs 19:42, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why this page and Talk:IPad/GA2? Pick one, please; I don't care which, although there's probably a convention to follow. HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 20:34, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've closed the other discussion as this page is where it should be. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 08:33, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think there should be some mention of the lack of Flash support so the coverage is broad. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 10:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some content on the lack of Flash support - I now have no issues with it. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 22:36, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see much if anything wrong with it, I don't particularly like the style of the prose in some parts but that's fairly minor, so I'm second guessing the issues I should be looking at. It would be better if you mentioned what you think has changed for the worse? Szzuk (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone close this discussion as no really substantial issues have been raised? -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 22:36, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, closed as kept. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]