Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Maximilian Kolbe/1

Maximilian Kolbe[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:17, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are a lot of self-published sourced tags and a CN tag. If the citations could be improved, then I think it could be kept as a GA. ❤History Theorist❤ 21:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HistoryTheorist I see the issue primarily concerns the use of http://catholicsaints.info/saint-maximilian-kolbe/ as source. It does not strike me as a RS. Non-conclusive single mention (critical) at RSN is at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_384#Religious_fansites. I support replacing this source with something more reliable. A quick glance at the refs here suggests that a few more are low quality too, if not tagged yet. I'll see if I have time to work on this in the near future. This passed GA almost 10 years ago, but I concur it is not up to modern standards. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:56, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.