Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Triple H/1

Triple H[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisting following no action taken over several months. CMD (talk) 15:23, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More than a year ago, this article was suggested to need Good Article reassessment. I notice that it still has some tags flagging issues with non-cited content and potentially unreliable sources, so I've brought it here. (t · c) buidhe 05:31, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see, there are some CN templates (a few titles, a few quotes and the filmography). Also, I have seen Bleacher report, which is unreliable. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:14, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Buidhe and HHH Pedrigree: This is quite old now, any comments on the current state of the article? I am transcluding this review onto the talk page, to see if it generates further input. CMD (talk) 17:25, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]