Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2018 July 12

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< July 11 << Jun | July | Aug >> July 13 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


July 12[edit]

we need contact no[edit]

Hi all, we need contact no. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.112.213.104 (talk) 06:40, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't told us whose contact number you need. Dbfirs 07:24, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you mean a general contact phone number for Wikipedia then we don't have it. See Wikipedia:Contact us or say what you want here if it can be discussed in public. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:41, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File deletion[edit]

Hi, can anyone delete this file for me, please?--NeoBatfreak 07:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

More than one account[edit]

Hi there, I have been recently accused of having more than one account in wikipedia. I always use my own account (this one) but I've been editing for more than 10 years and I start wondering if I did indeed have created an account other than this one during the last ten years. I honestly don't remember but maybe I did that because I edit on several wikipedias or maybe I was just testing something. I really don't know. In any case, my question is this: can I find out if I have more than one account on WP? Why would some other editor think that I use more than one account? Thank you. Arcillaroja (talk) 09:50, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arcillaroja. There is no restriction on having more than one account, as long as you don't use them in prohibited ways. See VALIDALT for some legitimate reasons for using more than one account. Since you say you are not aware that you have more than one account, you clearly can't be using more than one, either in legitimate or forbidden ways. I can't see any possible way to determine if you have more than one account. As for why another editor thinks you have, we can't tell without more information: I suggest you ask the editor in question on their User Talk page why they think so. People sometimes think that when they see several accounts editing the same articles with the same concerns and using the same language. Sometimes they are right, and there is sock puppetry going on; other times they are wrong, and there genuinely are two editors with very similar views and ways of expressing themsleves. --ColinFine (talk) 10:47, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks ColinFine. I already asked the guy so I'm waiting for his reply. Arcillaroja (talk) 11:20, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indicate telaga caste as forward caste in the right column/table[edit]

As per andhra pradesh government, Telaga caste is classified as forward caste in andhra pradesh. Telaga caste is a sub caste under Kapu caste category. Follow the links below to update correctly: http://www.kapusangam.com/history.php http://www.gulte.com/news/64268/Kapu-Reservation-Centre-Rejects-AP-Assembly-Bill http://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/Andhra-Pradesh/2018-02-10/Parties-should-fight-unitedly-for-Special-Status-Mudragada/358226 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.40.126.135 (talk) 11:21, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IP user. I can't tell which article you are talking about. The article Telaga quotes a government official as saying "It has been felt that Kapu, Balija, Telaga and Ontari Communities in the state are socially, educationally and economically in the backward condition than the other forward castes though it is being treated as a forward caste", but there is no table in that article, so it is probably not the one you are referring to. If you see something wrong with an article, the best place to discuss it is the Talk page of that article. --ColinFine (talk) 12:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not in Andhra Pradesh article either. Rmhermen (talk) 13:58, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

γεια[edit]

καλησπερα. πως μπορω να απαντησω σε καποιον χρηστη εδω μεσα που μου αναιρει οποιαδηποτε ενεργεια κανω στη wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeoGr (talk • contribs) 15:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TeoGr: Hello, this is the help desk for the English Wikipedia. If you have a question relating to editing, please ask it in English.
It appears that you asking how to reply to another editor? You can either 'ping' (see WP:PING) them as I have done here or you can go to their talk page (click 'talk' by their name in signatures or contributions) and leave a message. Please sign posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 15:40, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

good evening. how can I respond to someone I am here with any action I do on wikipedia?

@TeoGr: Please do not remove or edit another user's post at a talk page discussion. Thank you. If you wish to reply to the editor who has recently posted at your talk page, 'ping' them as noted above or click the pink lettering which is a link to their talk page. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Eagleash (talk) 16:22, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to the UN and the EU, the following country is called the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and not Macedonia. Wherever I try to fix it, someone is reporting me and changing it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by TeoGr (talk • contribs) 10:26, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You should read our article on it. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is a provisional description due to a dispute with Greece over the name Macedonia. Just because it's been accepted in to a club under a provisional different name, doen't mean a precedent has been created for the use of that name as a replacement. - X201 (talk)
(edit conflict) @TeoGr: Again, do not delete posts and comments by other users and please sign your posts. It appears that you are trying to change the name of the country following the outcome of recent discussions with Greece? However, you cannot change links to Wiki pages or to files (images) if the target page or file has not been updated. Your edits also do not provide a reliable source. I would suggest you begin a discussion at the page of the other editor involved or at the appropriate Wiki project (see the article talk page). This change may require a large number of edits across many pages and will require a consensus and a considerable amount of work by experienced editors. By raising the matter at appropriate talk pages you will set the process in motion. Eagleash (talk) 11:49, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TO CHANGE AN INTERMEDIATE encyclopedia the name is illegal. who is the club that accepted it? that is why you have overtaken a subject that is attacking residents of a country because you are harder to write the name of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeoGr (talk • contribs) 17:58, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @TeoGr:, just for the record, I did not report you, I simply left a warning on your talk page. My concern with your edit is not due to whatever talk page discussion or consensus may have occurred; it's the fact that you have blindly changed a file name twice now, which is breaking the image. To change the image name (which should only be done if you have gotten consensus), you would need to reupload the image to Wikipedia under the desired filename before changing it in the article. As you can see in this diff, your edits have left the article in a state of disrepair with several ugly red-links and broken files all throughout the article. Additionally, I would highly recommend not making comments about the legality of something as you did above, as that can unfortunately get you in some pretty serious trouble on Wikipedia. Please take some time to familiarize yourself with the guidelines and policies of Wikipedia, as they can be a bit intricate, and you're welcome to ask any other questions here as well in the meantime. Cheers, Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 05:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting messages and how to add them?[edit]

Yes, it's me again.

I've been looking for this for two hours now without success so I guess I'm returning to you fine folks at the Help desk again.

I wanted to ask about these "I have reverted your edits" messages like this one. Do I need to use them when undoing edits, how do I add these and do I need something like Huggle to add them? They seem useful, I want to be useful so I wanted to ask. Thanks in advance! LW001 (talk) 19:30, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you see an edit that appears to be unconstructive or otherwise incorrect, you can revert it by clicking undo at the end of the edit in the edit history. It is polite to leave further information on a user's talk page, as with the link you pointed out, but not required. If it is an edit that appears controversial, your best bet is to start a discussion on the article's talk page before reverting, or else you might find yourself in a revision war. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 19:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think LW001 is talking about user warnings. If so, then anybody can use them - just tools such as Huggle make using them automated. A full list of warnings can be found here. You can add them to talk pages yourself using the coding there. You should start with level 1, and get progressively higher if the user continues making disupritve edits. If you leave a user warning for which it is the first warning of that month or the first ever, you should put it under a new section called "[Month] [Year]," just to keep things organized. Additionally, if you install Twinkle, you can do this all automatically. Hope this helps, and please let me know if you have any further questions!--SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 20:06, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
SkyGazer 512 That is exactly what I was talking about, thank you so much! I don't seem to be cool enough for adding Twinkle yet (Autoconfirmed... That'll just take a few days though) but thanks for letting me know about it existing. LW001 (talk) 21:58, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relativity[edit]

dear editor.

On the subject of relativity, I brought the attention of bloggers on the Wikipedia platform to finding a definitive solution to the famous issue (Michaelson Morley's experience) that is quite different from that proposed by Albert Einstein and his contemporaries. I was also surprised that the news was not included in the Wikipedia platform I will mention. I am not a specialist, but the article on the new book on relativity is published in the Hal archive platform, which offers strong alternatives to its claim to the famous experiment and declares the end of the theory of proportionality and corruption. (First Newtonian Analyzes of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Using the Fixed Elastic Collision Law) Please review the articles by adding the critiques in this article.

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01802062.

best — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.243.97.121 (talk) 20:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thousands of scientific papers are published on the Internet every month. There is no evidence that this one is particularly useful to Wikiopedia. However, if you feel the paper's contents may be useful in one of our articles, then by all means create a new section on the article's talk page and discuss it there. If you have problems with editing a talk page, come back here and we can tell you how, but this help desk is not the place for discussions of article content. -Arch dude (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikipedia's job is not to change scientific consensus. As far as I can see, your paper has not yet been published (HAL, or ArXiv, or similar repositories, do not perform peer review). Per WP:FRINGE, Wikipedia will not address any random criticism of established theories until they have some traction (minority views are OK to mention, but only when that is the view of a significant minority of topic experts). A single, not-yet-published paper falls well short of that, no matter how insightful and well written. TigraanClick here to contact me 07:12, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not understand the talk page and two other questions[edit]

Hello,

I could not find the information regarding the three questions below. Therefore, here I am. Thank you, BelleCBelle

  1. 1 How do I use my "talk page?"
  • Generally your talk page is where other editors leave messages for you, usually in a new section per topic or per conversation. You can then respond to those messages by editing that section.
  1. 2 How do I communicate with another user?
  • Generally, you open a conversation wtih another editor by editing that editor's talk page. You continue a conversation by editing the section on that talk page or on your talk page. Often, however, a conversation is of general interest to all editors of a particular article. In that case, open the conversation on the article's talk page.
  1. 3 How do I add an external link that is general to the article, provides various information about the subject of the Wikipedia page?
  • you put if in the "external links" section, but this is to be used with care. It is much better to add it as a reference for specific portions of the article. Please avoid link spam. See WP:LINKSPAM

BelleCBelleBelleCBelle 20:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BelleCBelle (talk • contribs)

Gloria Lynne info on her nomination and induction to The Historymakers[edit]

I am very proud to inform you on the nomination, and induction to the historical honor bestowed on the Legendary Miss Gloria Lynne. On Feb.5th of 2008, I Ann C.Rubino nominated Miss Gloria Lynne to The Historymakers for her contribution in the field of music. I know she would be proud to see this great honor among her lifetime achievements, and honors. Please include this history making fact in her body of work. Thank You so much....Ann C.Rubino — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8B:8500:1565:F079:DFA4:6BFD:7550 (talk) 22:46, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to 'The HistoryMakers' as described in this article. I'm not familiar with this institution, but the article suggests that it is a (very) large historical archive of audio and video recordings of interviews with and other material about African-Americans.
It strikes me that, while such an enterprise is a laudible one, its sheer extent means inclusion within it would not in itself add very much to the reputation of the individuals concerned, and might not merit inclusion in existing articles about them. Inclusion is perhaps a consequence of their significance, rather than an augmentation of it? (I have no personal investment in the matter, being a European with no US connections or interests.)
If mention of Gloria Lynne's induction is judged to merit mention in our article about her, we perhaps ought to obtain a list of all inductees and make similar mentions in our articles about them, where they exist – a possibly daunting task! This might come under the aegis of a Project, but I can't immediately see an appropriate one.
Incidentally, we would in any case need to be able to cite a Reliable Source for the fact of the induction. The institution's website might suffice, since it seems reputable and Gloria Lynne is easily found on it. What think other editors? {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 90.201.156.145 (talk) 05:33, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gerard Casey artist[edit]

My DOB is incorrect...can you pls change it to1951.? Best regards, Gerard — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.76.208.20 (talk) 23:28, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2018_July_12&oldid=859143275"