The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I just nominated this image for deletion. I don't think we can have an article attacking an artist and illustrate it with a copyrighted example of his work. The artist, Jack Chick, is a narrow-minded bigot and I don't think it is possible for WP to have an article on him which is not negative in tone. (Sorry for my imperfect understanding of the image deletion process.) Redddogg (talk) 01:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, evident bad faith nomination by comments of nominator. Redfarmer (talk) 02:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, CSD I5. This is definitely a bad faith nomination, but the image is an unused copyrighted image so it can be speedied. Redfarmer (talk) 02:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strike that again. The image was removed from the article by the nominator so I've restored the image and, once again, say speedy keep for bad faith nomination. Redfarmer (talk) 02:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I really do not think this nomination is in bad faith, but I do think that Redddogg does not understand fair use or this website's image use policy. Our policy allows for the use of copyrighted images under fair use, as does US copyright law (the applicable law for this website). The image in question has a detailed, valid fair use rationale, and Redddogg has not made any arguments for why the rationale is invalid. He or she has also removed the image from the article repeatedly, referring to it as illegal, and considers any deeplinking to also be a violation of copyright law. This opinion has not been articulated by any US court. Copyright holders can prohibit deeplinking, but Chick Publications has not done so.
The article itself does not attack Chick. It is well-sourced as of today, and the bulk of the sources are statements Chick himself has made or statements from his official website. There is some sourced criticism, but Chick is a controversial figure and criticism is to be expected. Furthermore, US copyright law allows fair use of copyrighted materials whether the use is critical, adulatory, or simply informative. Natalie (talk) 02:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. Firstly, the subject of the article is an artist and is only notable because of his art and what he has done with it. An image of that art adds a level of understanding that cannot be reached without an image, and as all of the subject's work is under copyright there is no way to do this with a free image. This is precedent in the articles of other artists whose works are under copyright (see Jasper Johns, Georgia O'KeeffeRobert Crumb, and so on). Secondly, Chick's style is well known among both his supporters and detractors, and has been commented on by quite well known comic book artists (Robert Crumb, Art Speigelman, and so on). Some readers may be familiar with his work already, but for those who aren't a picture gives them the smallest introduction. We already link to Chick's site, where all of his in print tracts can be viewed for free, but as an encyclopedia we are supposed to be giving a full overview in our article. How can we have a full overview of an artist without a picture of his work? Natalie (talk) 23:01, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What's notable about Jack Chick is not his drawing style but the message his tracts convey, and that can be expressed in words. And as you say, there's a link to his website where all the work can be seen freely, so there's no need for us to repeat it here. —AngrIf you've written a quality article... 06:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mr Chick fall into much the same catigory as other comic artists and their various art styles are of interest.Geni 18:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
His art has also been commented on by other comic artists, displayed in the Smithsonian, and parodied frequently, This suggests that, in addition to his messages, his art is an important part of discussing him as a person. Natalie (talk) 16:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted Unused now. Another similar image, Image:Devils 22.gif is used in the article making using this in addition not practical (limited use per WP:FUP). MECU≈talk 15:11, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Orphaned image. Used only on page speedily deleted twice from Wikipedia for notability/COI/spam issues. Redfarmer (talk) 00:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A very unencyclopedic image, considering the article used. Why does an article need a "logo"? Jedravent (talk) 01:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I just noticed on its talk page that the uploader does not want this deleted, but it is extremely unencyclopedic nonetheless. --Jedravent (talk) 01:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete, absolutely no reason to have this on an article. Non-encyclopedic. Redfarmer (talk) 01:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(orphan image) user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he made this map. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
user sources everything to personal files, whether it's self-made or not. (also has a history of confirmed copyvios.) we need confirmation about whether he took this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
