User talk:Cardiffbaybee

Welcome!

Hello, Cardiffbaybee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Michaelbusch (talk) 18:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:The Bees Algorithm Poster.JPG[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:The Bees Algorithm Poster.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your contributions. However, I must remind you of WP:NPOV and Wikipedia's style guide with respect to the article The Bees Algorithm. Please also recognize WP:OR - you should provide references to sources using the technique and not describe the technique itself as a complex synthesis of other data. Michaelbusch (talk) 18:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the cleanup tags from The Bees Algorithm when the article is still in need of cleanup. The tags are not meant to disparage the content of the page, but only to flag it so that other editors will be aware it is in the process of being written and revision. Good articles aren't created in an hour. Michaelbusch (talk) 19:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For my edification: are you one of the originators of the algorithm? I note your username. If the algorithm was your work, please read Wikipedia's rules on conflicts of interest and remember to be especially careful in your editing. Thank you. Michaelbusch (talk) 19:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The Bees Alg Poster1.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:The Bees Algorithm Poster.JPG. The copy called Image:The Bees Algorithm Poster.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 19:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bees algorithm[edit]

From my deletion notes (here) it would appear that the article was a close facsimile of http://www.ims.sakarya.edu.tr/ims2006papers/IMS2006-inv05.doc. In other words, a violation of copyright. --DO11.10 (talk) 23:42, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, feel free to restart the article (i.e. click on the red link above and paste in the rewritten version). Best--DO11.10 (talk) 17:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks okay now, but I am still a bit concerned about allusions to a "figure 1" and "figure 2". That's just the sort of thing that will make people think this is a copyvio. You will either want to upload "figure 1", etc... or remove any language alluding to it.--DO11.10 (talk) 23:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Good Resolution The Bees Algorithm Poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Good Resolution The Bees Algorithm Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The Bees Alg Poster1.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:The Bees Alg Poster1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 14:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Good Resolution The Bees Algorithm Poster.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Good Resolution The Bees Algorithm Poster.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 14:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bees algorithm[edit]

The article Bees algorithm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

more "nature-inspired" metaheuristics cruft

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Ruud 10:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]