Wikipedia:Peer review/Beth Mead/archive1

Beth Mead[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I am interested in getting the article promoted to GA. I've been a long-term 'follower' of the article but most of my edits have been minor to date. I believe that the article is already of a very good quality and is one of the best women's football articles. I believe it would be helpful for someone less familiar with the subject to read the article and to assist me in making the necessary improvements.

Thanks, Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Keith D[edit]

Comments after a quick scan:

In the references there is a mixture of Arsenal, Arsenal, www.arsenal.com and Arsenal FC. I would standardise on one of these.

Keith D (talk) 01:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. I believe 'Arsenal FC' is the most appropriate and concise one out of these so I'll use that. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]