Wikipedia:Peer review/Cher/archive1

Cher

This peer review discussion has been closed.
With 25 studio albums released, plus 18 movies and three TV shows, Cher is an all-around entertainer who rose from an often impoverished and disrupted childhood to stardom. I've listed this article for peer review because I plan to soon take it to FA. I've made some profound research and I believe it fully covers all the relevant aspects of the life and career of the media icon without getting into too much detail. The main points raised on the previous FAC were the prose inconsistencies and the formatting of the references. Just a reminder, English is not my first language, if reviewers have comments could they please write in clear, full sentences to avoid confusion on my part.

Thanks to all. Lordelliott (talk) 22:42, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

I can do this one. I'm pretty busy in real life, but I should be able to get to it wihin the next few days. --Noleander (talk) 16:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Lordelliott (talk) 19:40, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments from Noleander

Begin comment from Noleander:

• First thing: can you post a note here explaining if you have addressed all the items raised at the prior FA nomination? Are there any issues you did not yet address? If not, why not? (it is okay to not fix things if you disagree with the FA reviewer's criticism, and your reasoning is good).
  • Yeah, I've addressed all the items. The only exception is the Goldmine quotation on the lead. One user thought it was too much detail to the lead, but I thought the lead must contain a little bit of approach on her influence, as on the David Bowie and Madonna articles. Also, I kept three sources that were questioned as unreliable by one user with no explanation (33, 173, 240).
• Footnote #280: an anonymous phone call: need a source that says that Cher was the caller.
  • Although she made an anonymous call, she was recognized by the host. Lordelliott (talk) 19:40, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
    • Maybe the host was wrong. Some reliable source, besides the host, needs to make that claim. --Noleander (talk) 19:44, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
      • After the host recognized her, Cher identified herself. She also made a guest appearance on C-SPAN three years later in which she discussed this phone call. Lordelliott (talk) 19:54, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

The self-identification could be a hoax. If Cher, in person, confirmed her identity 3 years later, then that should be the source for the assertion that she was the caller. The 1st call itself is not an adequate source. --Noleander (talk) 19:57, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

 Done Lordelliott (talk) 20:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

• Lead: every thing in the lead needs to be repeated (okay to use different wording) with citation in body. I dont see the following in the body: ", she is often referred to as the Goddess of Pop for having first brought the sense of female autonomy and self-actualization into the entertainment industry."
  • It is on the Legacy section. The excerpt "... for having first brought the sense of female autonomy and self-actualization into the entertainment industry" is a resume of the scholar opinions presented on the Legacy section.

The term "self-actualization" has very specific meaning; for it to be in the lead connected to the title "Goddess of pop", then that connection must be (1) stated by a source; and (2) the connection & cite needs to be in the body. --Noleander (talk) 19:55, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

"A major figure for over five decades in popular culture, she is often referred to as the Goddess of Pop and is recognized for having first brought the sense of female autonomy and self-actualization into the entertainment industry." - Reworded. Lordelliott (talk) 20:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

• Lead: WP:PEACOCK - " became one of the most acclaimed film " - "acclaimed" is a bit promotional; better to just stick to the facts. If she starred in ten major movies, that fact speaks for itself.
  •  Done Lordelliott (talk) 19:51, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
• Peacock: The following would be better in the body, in a "reception" or "impact" section: "Biographer Mark Bego says: "No one in the history of show business has had a career of the magnitude and scope of Cher's"." Putting it in the lead is too fan-ish. The lead should be utterly factual & objective. Think boring BBC newscasters.
  •  Done Lordelliott (talk) 19:59, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
• Lordelliott: Cher is a huge article. For me to review it here in this PR, you'll just have to go with the flow and basically do everything I say. If you have a compelling reason for ignoring my advice, fine, state your reason. But you are already pushing-back on about 50% of my recommendations. Your arguments may have some merit, but my time is limited, and I just don't have time to post 2 or 3 comments in reply to you on every recommendation. My review style is very fast and mostly 1-way. So, if you would rather wait for another reviewer who has more time to engage in dialog, that is fine .. I'll take no offense. Let me know if you want me to continue or not.

Yeah, I want you to continue. I'm in no way ignoring your advice; I was just trying to achieve a consensus. But since your time is limited, I'll try my best to do everything you say. Thanks, Lordelliott (talk) 20:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

• Lead: adjective: "..she starred in hit films ..." - word "hit" is a bit promotional; how about " ..she starred in films such as ..."
• Lead: slang: "She is the only artist to have notched a number-one single .." - "notched" is too slangy; wording must be very professional. Try "She is the only artist to have a number-one single .."
• Lead: grammar: ".. which dealt with unusual subjects in mainstream popular music." - Try "which dealt with subjects rarely addressed in American popular music."
  •  Done Lordelliott (talk) 17:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Early life

• Age; "Cher's family noticed her creativity when she produced the musical Oklahoma! in school .." - need her age at this event.
  • Added "at the end of fifth grade" (according to source). Lordelliott (talk) 17:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
• Wording informal: "truck driver riddled with drug " - "riddled" is too informal; remember that many readers will be persons with English as not their native language; so use plainer wording. Just remove the word "riddled".
• grammar: "...and model with Irish, English, German and Cherokee descent." - Either (1) change "descent" to "ancestry"; or (2) change "with" to "of"
• Uniformity: "Holt and John married and divorced ..." - Dont mix 1st and last names. Say "Georgia and John" or "Holt and Sarkasian".
• key detail: "At one point, Holt had to put Cher in an orphanage." - for a day? a week? a year?
  • Added "for several weeks". Lordelliott (talk) 17:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
• Why quote: "According to biographer Connie Berman, "Cher got a group of ..."" - Quotes should be used sparingly, usually if someone famous has a witty thing to say; or if a major critic has some key insight; or of the speaker is saying something outrageous or controversial. But avoid for plain historial facts from a biographer. Just remove the quote and restate in the encyclopedia's voice.
• quote source? - "and behavior after the "eccentric, fast-living young woman" character ..." - Whose words are those? Cher's? or the biographers? The reader will only want a quote if those are Cher's words, in which case Cher should be identified in the prose as "Cher admired AH, who she considered to be a "ecc, fl .""
• non sequitur - " Despite the difficult times and the instability of her mother's marriages, Cher wanted to be famous .." - No reason for all the words before "Cher": it is natural for youngsters in difficult situations to want to be famous.
• Unneeded: "She later commented in an interview, "I couldn't think of anything ..."" - No reason for word "later": of course she is not giving an interview at high school age. Maybe "She commented in a 1993 interview, ...."
• Gender: "Like Cher's stepfather, the fathers of Montclair Prep students were financially successful." - Some of the $$ may be from mothers; plus there may be grants for poor students. Just say "MP was a school with students from affluent families" or something like that.
• Unneeded: " She also achieved notoriety for her unconventional b ..." - Word "also" is almost never needed in any article.

All  Done. Lordelliott (talk) 17:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

1960s

• Terminology: "and were unofficially married in October 1964 " - There is no such thing as an unofficial marriage in California: either they got married or did not. Maybe it was a small, civil procedure at the courthouse?
  • Added "and performed their own wedding ceremony in a hotel room in Tijuana, Mexico", according to source. Lordelliott (talk) 17:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
• Wording: "... where she took acting classes and had jobs to support herself. " - "had jobs" doesnt sound right there. Maybe "..and worked to support ..".
• Detail? - "She danced in small clubs along Hollywood's .." - What kind of dancing? ballroom, Jazz, strip clubs? go-go?
  • Unspecified by source.
• Detail? - " she had a brief relationship ." - Business relationship? Golfing partners? If it was an affair, the article should say so.
• WOrding: " When Sonny finally gave up ... he began going out to the stage with her to sing the harmonies." - Reword (1) "gave up" what? Prior sentence doesnt say what he was resisting; (2) No need for "when", try: " Sonny finally gave up ... and he began going out to the stage with her to sing the harmonies."
• Wording: "which went by unnoticed." - not precise enough. Maybe "which did not not sell well" or "which were poorly received" or something like that.
• Specificity: "The album reached the Billboard 200 top 20 and ..." - If sources say the exact position, it should be stated here
  • Unspecified by source.
• Link: "cover version of .." - link "cover" to WP article, on first usage.
• Precision: "At one point, they had five songs in the top 20,..." - Name the month/year.
  • Unspecified by source.
• Unneed quote: "and became "one of the biggest-selling and most beloved pop/rock hits of the mid-'60s" - Who is this quote from? This is a good quote, since "beloved" is a bit subjective/emotional, but should state the quotes source in the article prose. It is best of the quote is from someone notable/famous, not just a biographer.
  • This is from Bruce Eder, a music critic of Allmusic. Should I remove this quote?
• Wording: "openly monogamous, drug-free lifestyle had become obsolete due to ..." - "obsolete" should be replaced with something more precise: "not commercial" or "lost its appeal to American youth" or "fell out-of-step with music trends" etc

All  Done. Lordelliott (talk) 19:15, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

• Who? - "According to Berman, .." - Lost track of who this is, restate full name each time used, unless prior occurrence is very nearby.
• Cap in quote - "According to Berman, "The heavy, loud sound of groups .." - initial letter in quote should be lower case here, in general, even tho cap in the source.
• No quote: - "they were featured in "silly" skits. ... " - No need to quote "silly", just say childish, or immature, or inoffensive, or some representative word.
• Wording: "The "arty" movie stiffed, costing t .." - (1) Replace quoted "arty" with a better unquoted word; (2) "stiffed" is slang: replace with professional wording.
• Wording: "At a low professional ebb, .." - Not professional enuf for FA. Maybe "nadir of their career" or " a low point int their career" or "popularity was waning .."
• Wording: " in which they opted for a more mainstream approach in sound and style. .." - (1) "opted" -> "which relied on a more ..."; (2) what does "mainstream" mean in this context? Less sophomoric? More rock-and-roll?
  • Reworded: "more adult approach ..."
• Who? - "According to Wilson, .."
• spelling? - "Wooded by television executives,.. " - Supposed to be "wooed"? If so, 'woo" is too slangy. Try "TV executives took note of their success and S&C began to .."

All  Done. Lordelliott (talk) 20:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

1970s

• No quote: " and becoming an "enormous" success, .." - just remove the word.
• Clarify: "Around this time, Cher had well-known flirts .." - Not sure what that means? Sexual affairs? Deep friendships? Mere "flirting" is not very important. The mere fact that somone invited her to meet them, and she declined, is not very significant. Do the sources make a big deal out of it? Need proof.
  • Removed.
• Wording: "In February 1974, Cher countered with a divorce suit .." - "counter" means to reply to an action. Maybe just "filed a divorce .."
• Wording: "Cher lived a two-year relationship with .." - "Cher was in a ..." or "Cher had a two .."
• Wording: "Her solo show, entitled simply Cher, debuted as .." - What solo show? was it mentioned before? if not, just say "Cher starred in a solo TV show ..."
  • Reworded: "On February 16, 1975, Cher debuted a solo TV show, Cher, as a highly rated special featuring guests Flip Wilson, Bette Midler and Elton John."
• Details? - "Cher lasted for less than a year, to be replaced by a reunion of Cher and Sonny; ... " - What year & how long did the reunion show last? series or just 1 special show?
  • The reunion is detailed on the following paragraph.
• No cap: " she said, "Doing a s .. "" - "doing .."

All  Done. Lordelliott (talk) 20:31, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

• Non sequitur: "A single mother with two children, Cher decided to change the direction of her singing career by temporarily abandoning her desire to be a rock singer and signing with Casablanca Records to capitalize on the disco craze. " - Not clear what motherhood has to do with changing from rock to disco.
  • "A single mother with two children, Cher realized that she had to make a choice about the direction of her singing career. Deciding to temporarily abandon her desire to be a rock singer, she signed with Casablanca Records and made a major comeback with the single "Take Me Home" and the album of the same name, which capitalized on the disco craze."
• No quote: "that made the album "unfocused" and contributed to its failure." - keep word 'focused' but eliminate quote marks, and attribute to the source "... according to Joe Smith"
• Wording - " on the soundtrack to the film " - "of the film"
• Spelling: - "She filled for divorce nine " - filed

All  Done. Lordelliott (talk) 05:37, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

1980s

• Clarify: "... she formed the rock band Black Rose with her then-partner, guitarist Les Dudek." - Business partner? Lover?
  • Boyfriend.
• No quote: "Although Cher was the lead singer, she did not receive top billing because "she wanted to create the impression that all band members were equal."[" - replace quote with paraphrase
• Wording: "Cher was at the "pinnacle of her career" as a nightclub personality in Las Vegas, earning US $300,000 a week" - No need for quote. Another pinnacle comes later in her career, so why confuse readers. Try ""Cher became a successful nightclub personality in ..."
• Wording: "Her earliest entertainment ambitions had always lain in film ..." - "Her earliest entertainment ambitions laid in film, ..."
• Wording: " and producers and directors in Hollywood did not take her seriously as an actor ... " try "and the Hollywood establishment did not take her seriously as an actor..."
• Wording " In 1982, Cher moved to New York to take acting lessons with Lee Strasberg, founder of the Actors Studio, but she never got to do it." - sounds wrong. try "Cher moved to NY in 1982 with the intention of taking .... with LS, but her plans changed and she never enrolled" or something like that.
• Precision: "Uninhibited, which earned about US $15 million in its first year sales, an" - gross sales? or net profits?
  • Unspecified by source.

All  Done. 05:37, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

1990s

• Non sequitur: " Despite the film's subdued reception, today it is considered a cult classic." - Most cult classics did have subdued receptions.
  • Removed "Despite the film's subdued reception".
• Bundle cites: " stayed at number one in the UK for six weeks and spawned four hit singles, most notably the UK top-ten hit "Love and Understanding".[123][124][125]" - Three footnotes adjacent like that can look ugly. See WP:CITEBUNDLE - keep all three cites, but pack them into a single footnote.
• Wording: "Partly because of her bad experience on Mermaids, " - "with Mermaids"
• Wording: "Cher turned down two leading roles .." - " ..down leading roles .."
• Wording: "Cher scored a comeback when she starred ..." - "scored" is slangy; try "achieved" or "made"
• Cite bundling: "them questioning her movie career as dead.[33][131][133] "
• Wording: "marked an extreme musical departure " - eliminate word "extreme"

All  Done. Lordelliott (talk) 02:53, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

2000s

• Puffery: "The show featured 16 dancers and aerialists, "state-of-the-art" video and special effects, and "ambitious" set designs.[197]" - It looks like that source is a public relations release? That cannot be used as a source, unless the text specifically attributes it as such. Better is to find what independent critics said about the show and put that in.
  • Added: "According to Caesars Palace's press release". Lordelliott (talk) 05:37, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
    • That is an improvement, but for an FA quality article, it would be better to replace that assessment of the show with something that a neutral critic said. --Noleander (talk) 01:14, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
      • I will search for a neutral review.
• Too many commas: "One song from the album, "Sisters of Mercy", ..." - that sentence is too convoluted. Try to reword to be simpler, fewer commas.
  • Reworded: " In the song "Sisters of Mercy", she called the Catholic nuns who cared for her when she was a child "cruel, heartless and wicked" for keeping her in their orphanage long after her mother attempted to retrieve her; that caused controversy among church leaders, who quickly issued denouncements."
• Clarify: "In 2001, still in a dance mode, Cher released .." - Not too sure what that means. Is she still primarily singing/releasing songs that are dance-oriented? Try to reword to make it clearer.
  • Reworded: "In 2001, Cher released the highly anticipated dance-oriented follow-up to Believe: Living Proof ..."
• Wording: " after she split with Warner UK last year. .." - "last year" has no meaning in an article. Perhaps "in the prior year"?
• Not important/puffery: "earning Cher a place in the Guinness Book of World Records." - The GBWR is not important at all. If she set a record, just say that.
• Wording: "..The tour earned upwards of ..." - "upwards" is slang/hard to understand. Just say "more than".

All  Done. Lordelliott (talk) 02:53, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

2010

• Focus on $$$: "which grossed over US $89 million worldwide" - The article has a lot of $$ figures like that; some reviewers might think it has too many. For instance, in the Burlesque paragraph, the question that jumps to my mind is: that $ figure is pretty unimportant; are there some other, more interesting facts about the musical Burlesque which are not in the article?
  • Removed.
• Cite bundling: " a number-one hit on the U.S. dance charts.[200][201][202]"
• Wording: "As of 2012, Cher has been working on her first studio album .." - "as of" is not best here. Maybe, "during" or "starting in"?
• Wording: "were Cher's outside choices." - "outside" is not a good word here. Maybe "were songs composed by independent songwriters, selected by Cher" or something?

All  Done. Lordelliott (talk) 02:53, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Other

• Fawning: "museum immortalized her with a life-size statue.." - Some reviewers might think that the article has too many words that idolize Cher; here "immortalized her with" could just be "created a".
  • Reworded: "honored her with".
• Clarify: " after being discovered by the then-Vogue magazine director Diana Vreeland. " - by 1967 she was not unknown in the music world, so maybe this could be made more specific to modeling. e.g. "... after the modeling industry discovered her ..."
• Wording "In the late 1990s, Cher began having laser treatments to remove her tattoos.[247] The process went underway in the 2000s." - "went underway" is not correct. Maybe "was still underway"?
• Similar sections: The two sections "Legacy" and "Artistry" seem to overlap too much. Especially Legacy and "Public Image". You need to look at the paragraphs one-by-one, and get them co-located into the correct section. Here is just an idea: put the fashion stuff into a new section on Fashion; move the "Throughout her career Cher has repeatedly reinvented herself" paragr into the Public Image section. Put the longevity paragr into a new subsection within Legacy. You get the idea.
  • Created a new subsection for the fashion stuff within "Artistry"; moved the "Throughout her career Cher has repeatedly reinvented herself" paragr into the Public Image section; splitted longevity paragr in two.
• More confusion: the Public Image has "Cher figured twice on "The 25 Most Intriguing People of the Year" list compiled by People, in 1975 and 1987.[233][234] In 1992, Madame Tussauds wax museum immortalized her with a life-size statue as one of the five most beautiful women of history." - but that seems like it belongs in Legacy/honors/awards section. Again: every sentence needs to be moved to the correct thematic section.
  • Moved.
• Cite needed: "Cher has engaged in the construction of houses with Habitat for Humanity and served as the Honorary National Chair of a Habitat's elimination of poverty housing initiative "Raise the Roof", an effort to engage artists in the organization's work while on tour. "
  • Source added.
• Cite needed: "On October 27, 2003, Cher anonymously called a C-SPAN phone-in program. " - It is not enough to provide audio of the anonymous call; it could have been a hoax. Someone else must state conclusively that Cher called anonymously on such-and-such a date. The cite must point to the latter information, not the anon call.
  • New source added.

All  Done. Lordelliott (talk) 03:57, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

• Missing content: Cher as a gay icon - I'm no expert on Cher, but I've heard a lot about the topic of that article. It deserves at least a couple of sentences in the Cher article.
  • Added on the "Legacy" section: "Her longevity, along with the accomplishments in her career and her sense of style, has been identified as the main reason behind the reverence held for Cher by members of the gay community.[268] She has often been imitated by drag queens because, according to Thomas Rogers of Salon magazine, she "overcame insult and hardship on [her] path to success," and because her story "mirror the pain that many gay men suffer on their way out of the closet."[269] " Lordelliott (talk) 17:26, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Since Cher's reaction to Chaz Bono coming out as a lesbian was highly reported by the press, should it be covered on the "Life and career" section? Lordelliott (talk) 04:29, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
    • Probably best as a new paragraph at the end of the Public Image section. --Noleander (talk) 17:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
      •  Done. Lordelliott (talk) 22:57, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
• Missing content: There must be some important material about how feminists view her. On the one hand, she is a strong, independent, creative woman that is not dependent on a man; on the other hand, she has lots of cosmetic surgery etc. Surely, some notable feminists have analyzed her: what do they say?
  • I found this one. Could you help me paraphrasing this to the article? Lordelliott (talk) 04:43, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
    • That looks like a good source. That is discussing an article in Ms magazine. Maybe you could find the text of that original Ms article and use that also. Also look at:
      • • Cosmetic Surgery: A Feminst Primer page 29, in Google Books
        • Fragile Moralities and Dangerous Sexualities: Two Centuries of Community page 25 in Google books
    • I don't have much time to help with paraphrasing. I'd suggest you look thru Google Books for "Cher feminism" etc and see what you get. --Noleander (talk) 17:19, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
      • I added that on the "Legacy" section: "Cher was featured in the 16th anniversary edition of Ms. magazine as a "Feminist Extraordinaire" and an "authentic feminist hero": "Cher, the straightforward, tattooed, dyslexic single mother, the first Oscar winner to have entered into matrimony with a known heroin addict and to have admitted to being a fashion victim by choice, has finally landed in an era that's not afraid to applaud real women."[268] However, Kathleen Park of Orlando Sentinel felt that this choice was miserable, stating that, despite being "a star of extraordinary proportions", Cher "hardly embodies, at least publicly, the qualities that earn one respect in this world."[268] Park added that Cher "is praised for doing all the things most of us try so hard not to do in our efforts to grow."[268] " Is this enough content about how feminists view her? Lordelliott (talk) 22:22, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
• Spouse/Kid list: Should add a list of spouses & children to Info Box, see Elizabeth Taylor for an example.
  • Musical infobox does not support that, but I will add another infobox. Lordelliott (talk) 22:22, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure the FA reviewers will not like the two infoboxes. I don't really see great solution here. Personally, I would change the InfoBox to {{Infobox person}} which lets you add spouse & children, but is not focused on music. But other editors might think the Music infobox is essential. I guess you should remove that small spouse/child infobox.--Noleander (talk) 01:17, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Right. Do you think the content I've added on the "Legacy" section about how feminists view her is enough? Should I do some more research? Lordelliott (talk) 02:06, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

I should be enough for now. However, I would put the "feminism" and "gay icon" material into their own (dedicated) paragraphs ... I think they are in a large paragraph with other material? --Noleander (talk) 04:35, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

• •  Done. Lordelliott (talk) 22:40, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
• All done. The article is better now. I think you could get Good article status for sure (nominate it at WP:GAN if you want to go that route). If you want to nominate it for FA again, your best path is to have one more FA-expert review it. I recommend User:GabeMc, who has gotten several music-oriented articles to FA status. Or, you can pick any reviewer you see at WP:FAC. They can do the review anywhere: in the article Talk page; here in this PR page; or you can start a whole new PR #2. After you go through one more review, I think it will be ready for FA status. It may be tempting to nominate the article now, after my review, but with large, complex articles on well known topics, I promise you that the best path is to have 2 or 3 PRs before the FA nomination!! Congratulations, you've done a lot of work on it, and it is really looking nice now. --Noleander (talk) 04:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your advices Noleander! I already contacted User:GabeMc and he's doing a new PR. Your help was very valuable!! Lordelliott (talk) 17:52, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

End Noleander comments. --Noleander (talk) 16:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Other comments

Hi Noleander. Please remember that Template:Cite_web#Publisher states that the publisher is "not normally included for periodicals". You may wish to remove them before taking this to FA. Good luck! GoingBatty (talk) 23:27, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the input! PS: I'm just the reviewer, not the nominator. I'll make sure the nominator sees your comment. --Noleander (talk) 00:57, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Oops! Sorry about that! GoingBatty (talk) 01:30, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Comments from Wikipedian Penguin

This review was moved to Wikipedia talk:Peer review/Cher/archive1 on 28 January 2013, and is still underway. —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 21:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)