Wikipedia:Peer review/Drama Queen (Ivy Queen album)/archive3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Drama Queen (Ivy Queen album)[edit]

Previous peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because the article has been recently promoted to GA, and would like to try for FA. I feel it is a very strong article, though sections like the lead could use help.

Thanks, DivaKnockouts (talk) 08:21, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Bald Zebra

Overall this is a good interesting article - I can't believe it's taken 3 weeks for someone to review this!

External Links / References
There appear to be some major issues with some of your references / external links:
  • References 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 20, 25, 30, 31 and 33 (linking to pandora.com) are all inaccessible for users outside the US, Australia and New Zealand - you'll need to find an alternative source for these.
Okay, so the information that is used with these must be removed? Or, if I archive these links, they should be available then, right?
Yes, the track listing at Liveweb seems to work fine. You won't need to remove anything - all you'll need to do is add the "archiveurl=" attributes to the reference code. ★ Bald Zebra ★ talk 19:50, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've gone ahead and archived them directly just in case. Now, to find where the Billboard articles have been moved to. Also, the remaining Billboard articles that haven't been affected should probably archived as well right? — DivaKnockouts (talk) 22:47, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Wikilinks used in these citations are wrong - they link to Pandora (the goddess) when they should link to Pandora Radio.
 Done
  • References 2, 23, 46-60, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 80 (linking to billboard.com) all appear to be broken.
Okay, it seems that with Billboard's new remodeling, all of these links have been broken. I will try to find where these links have been moved to.

Alright. I've added (registration required) to references 45-59 and 75-79, since they were registration required links. I think that's all the broken links, did I miss any? — DivaKnockouts (talk) 02:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I not 100% sure about this but if those links are registration-only, it may affect the chances of this article getting to Featured Article standard as not everyone would be able to access them. Are you sure Billboard haven't moved those links elsewhere? ★ Bald Zebra ★ talk 10:56, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, I don't think so, since they were registration required before the move, my good friend Hahc21 ([[User talk:Hahc21|talk) told me it shouldn't matter. I'll look deeper into this. Thanks for your reviews and time on this article, I greatly appreciate it. — DivaKnockouts (talk) 11:29, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lead
  • " It features a wide variety of musical styles, prominent on her previous album, Sentimiento released three years earlier and on a different record label." - I feel this sentence needs a bit of tweaking, for example "It features a wide variety of musical styles, as was prominent on her previous album Sentimiento, released three years earlier and on a different record label."
 Done
 Done
  • "Drama Queen spawned two singles" - this sounds like something out of a horror movie! Consider changing this to something like "Two singles were released from the album"
 Done
Background
  • "It's a privilege to have Ivy Queen apart of over artistic roster." Probably a typo, but it's hard to verify as the reference is broken.
 Done, Will check for an alternate source.
Recording and production
  • "...a roster of well-known urban artist..." - should be a plural.
 Done
Singles
  • First paragraph: mun2 and Vevo should be wikilinked, as anyone outside the US probably won't have heard of these.
 Done
  • "Queen said that the genre bachata is more meaningful " - should this be "bachata genre"? Or is this a direct quotation?
 Done

If I have any more suggestions, I'll let you know.

Thanks for your time and reviewing this article. I great appreciate it. Regards. — DivaKnockouts (talk) 17:01, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, ★ Bald Zebra ★ talk 15:57, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]