Wikipedia:Peer review/Dromedary/archive2

Dromedary[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I think this is well-developed to become a FA. I hope this peer review would take my attention to overlooked problems or obstacles for the article's FAC.

Thanks, Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 09:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the bold red instruction in the "Nomination procedure" box at the top of the PR page. Yomangani ^talk 23:42, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I really did not know about this. What do I ought to do now? --Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 12:08, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Either close this one (follow the instructions on how to archive at the top of the PR page) and concentrate on the giant eland or vice versa. Yomangani ^talk 12:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The giant eland review is now archived, so this peer review can be started. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 12:11, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You mention that they have oval shaped blood cells but don't mention their function. The TV show Inside Nature's Giants discusses this. Also I think you should mention the turbinates which keeps the brain cool. LittleJerry (talk) 01:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestions. Will have to look about anatomy to find more. Well, I can not use the information from this TV show unless it can be cited, and I haven't ever heard of it.Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 13:26, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay fine. Got access to the TV show website, using the info. Thanks! Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 10:37, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]