Wikipedia:Peer review/Hurdy gurdy/archive1

Old Peer review for Hurdy gurdy[edit]

I am nominating this article because I was very impressed upon first reading. I found the article very informative and think that it has potential to be a featured article. Please leave any comments about how the article may be improved. Thank you. --malber 15:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely not at FA status. The article needs to be sourced. There are absolutely no citations to be found in the article. I found the first sentence awfully difficult to read and more so to understand. A good article should be able to stand on its own without me having to research elsewhere and, for example, have a knowledge of musical terminology. The section about types of hurdy-gurdies needs to be expanded. MyNameIsNotBob 08:27, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]