Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Liverpool F.C. statistics and records/archive2

List of Liverpool F.C. statistics and records[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for July 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because after re-working the list in format and making it more in line with lists of a similar nature that are Featured Lists such as List of Birmingham City F.C. statistics and records, I feel the list is close to reaching that standard. I have brought the list to Peer review to iron out any kinks before I go to FLC. Thanks in advance for your comments NapHit (talk) 20:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Jameboy (talk · contribs)

I think you should explain what is meant by "ever-present", maybe by adding a footnote. Does it mean that Neal played in every minute of every match, started every match or played some part in every match? Does it refer to all matches or just league games?
The lead needs to be re-phrased so as not to start with "this is a list of..."
In the 'international' section, you should link the countries to the national football team, not the country itself, e.g 'Germany' should link to Germany national football team. More of these could be linked than currently are.
I think the first instance of Rotherham Town should be linked, rather than the second
In the 'Points' section, I don't think you need to link every instance of 'First Division' - just the first one would be OK.

Hope this is useful. --Jameboy (talk) 18:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - "Most games without scoring: Ephraim Longworth, 371" - Clemence and Grobelaar both played more games than this, and I don't believe either of them ever scored....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]