Wikipedia:Peer review/List of missing ships/archive1

List of missing ships[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've just started compiling this list for almost a month. I think I have come upon a stable format in which new entries can simply be added to the existing table structure. I also need to develop criteria for inclusion. As one can realise, this list can grow very large. Thanks, --Kvasir (talk) 17:22, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)

Not sure where you want to go with this. FLC or just to make it a decent list? Unfortunately, as yet there's no concept of a Good list (although I know not why) so these comments are aimed at potential FLC.

Get familiar with the {{Cite web}} template! The article appears very well referenced but the template is a much more elegant way to add citations.
"implies all hands lost." - explain this to non-experts.
Refs should be placed directly after punctuation, per WP:CITE.
Why the empty sections? Presumably you're going to fill them in?
"Possible or Last Known Location" - reduce caps and you really need to indicate which one for each missing ship.
If it was me, I'd force the table column widths to be the same so you get a consistent feel through the whole article.
Fix any citation needed's.
Nereus has no location.
Capelin has no citation.
S Aus & W Aus are empty.
Year for Albion?
Radcliff and Fleetwing and Raven need location info. As do a number of the U-boats.

Food for thought. I hope... The Rambling Man (talk) 17:11, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]