Wikipedia:Peer review/Microsoft Office/archive1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I think it needs general review.

Thanks, Kozuch (talk) 12:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked.
As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark.
The {{prose}} tag, well, make the article satisy the manual of style and remove the tag.
Filled with {{fact}} templates. Add references and remove them.
I would recommend using (although not required) {{citeweb}}, {{citenews}} etc. for the references.
The {{expand}} tags - expand the sections.
That's all for now... « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie ^{( talk / contribs)} 22:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]