Wikipedia:Peer review/Opus Dei/archive2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Opus Dei[edit]

Previous PR is at Wikipedia:Peer review/Opus Dei/archive1.

I think the tone of this article needs to be improved, so I'm sending this to peer review. Otherwise the content isn't too bad IMO. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:44, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • In the top section, the 2nd paragraph seems a bit long and contains a lot of info that should probably be contained below. I would trim it some. Briancua 18:55, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program. They may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on my talk page.
  • Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) maybe too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per WP:SS.
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.