Wikipedia:Peer review/Organizational commitment/archive1

Organizational commitment

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because we have been assigned as a group to improve the quality of this wikipedia page. Any suggestions about how to make our edits better would be much appreciated. We are all new to this and are a little unsure if what we are doing is always correct. We are open to any and all suggestions and constructive criticism for our page.

Thanks, Cmchildress (talk) 16:48, 29 March 2012 (UTC)cmchildressCmchildress (talk) 16:48, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments

• Avoid all the overcapitalisation. "Organizational Behavior" mid-sentence is not a pair of proper nouns, so shouldn't be capitalised. Check throughout.
• "future research.” [1] " two things here, first put the ref directly after the punctuation (i.e. no space) and second, use " rather than ” per WP:PUNC.
• "by Kanter (1968)[citation needed])." fix, and the other ones.
• "Affective Commitment" overcapitalised.
• If you use "AC" as an abbreviation, put (AC) after the first use of it in prose.
• "found a correlation of 0.73 between" I think you need to explain this kind of thing in more detail.
• "Cmchildress (talk) 17:46, 28 March 2012 (UTC)cmchildressCmchildress (talk) 17:46, 28 March 2012 (UTC)" remove your own signature from the page!
• Refs 1-3 are the same, so use <ref name=blah>....</ref> for the first one then <ref name=blah/> for the subsequent refs.
• Use an en-dash per WP:DASH in the refs for page ranges, year ranges etc.
• Formatting issues on the last three references.
• You have a red-linked category, usually these aren't a good idea unless you're going to populate the new category with several more articles.

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:32, 11 April 2012 (UTC)