Wikipedia:Peer review/Pilibhit/archive1

Pilibhit

• A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for February 2009.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I found it would be useful for the reader to know about the place. i found, the article is very informative.

Please review, and provid eyour valueable comments

Thanks, Makks2010 (talk) 04:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Redtigerxyz's comments

• There are too many lists and tables, are given WP:UNDUE weight in the article.
• Some of images used are copyright violations, all images not checked.
• All references used are not WP:reliable sources eg.
  • http://www.indiabudgettravel.com/travel-tool-kits/distance-calculator.html
  • http://indianmuslims.in/a-historical-perspective-on-indian-muslims/
  • http://smriti.com/hindi-songs/name-anjum-pilibhiti#lyrics etc.
• Convert Lists --> prose, tagged.
• This article is Pilibhit, the city not Pilibhit district right? So all info about Pilibhit district is irrelevant here, put in district article.
• Needs copyediting for refining the language. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

GDibyendu's comments

• Move the gallery to an image file and keep a link to that in see also section.
• See also section should not link to articles which are already linked in this page text. See WP:MOS for see also section.
• Change the tables to text.
• Look how FA level city articles are organized. Example: Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Bangalore etc. Some sections should be summary of another supporting article, particularly the sections which are long. Also, see the page on cities workgroup under Wikipedia:WikiProject India, which provides a guideline on how such an article should be organized.
• More comments later.--GDibyendu (talk) 10:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
• Move all the district related info to district page. City article should contain info on the city only. Once this is done, I have a feeling that district article is going to have more content than city article.--GDibyendu (talk) 06:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)