Wikipedia:Peer review/Presbyterian Ladies' College, Sydney/archive1

Presbyterian Ladies' College, Sydney[edit]

I've been working on this article for quite a few months and am now a bit stuck on how to improve it further. Article was recently rated as B/High and "considered close, if not already at GA class". Would love some feedback/constructive criticism in order to reach atleast GA class. Thanks! Loopla 07:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am the one that recently gave it a assessment for WikiProject Schools following a request. I gave it B class as that was the highest I could give without a peer review. I have read through the article and I can confidently say it meets GA class - with a maybe on A or FA class. The main strengths in the article are is it covers notable topics well with sensible use of pictures and is well referenced with multiple sources used. I would also like to hear more feedback on this article so we can reach a fair rating and find any weaknesses. Camaron1 | Chris 12:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have received some feedback at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment on this. Recommendations to improve the article include:

Facilities section needs to re-organised and put into a prose format with trivial details removed.
School uniform section should be summarised with trivial details removed.
Some more information on the curriculum for the school to help a general audience.

Most of the feedback seems to be in reference to Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools#Structure. Camaron1 | Chris 14:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is v near a Good Article and will certainly be after the mods above. Well done to all concerned. Victuallers 14:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback everyone!! It's much appreciated. Will make the necessary changes as soon as possible. Thanks again! Loopla 08:39, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]