Wikipedia:Peer review/Windows Vista/archive1

Windows Vista

Hello. This is already a Good Article, but with the increasing amount of attention this article's going to get in the coming months, it'd be great to have some input from the peer review group on how we can really make this a shining example of Wikipedia's very best work. -/- Warren 14:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

• Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 18:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

It starts well but comes very list-heavy and is a bit long overall (74kb). The "new features" already have their own page and I think too many of them are included in the main article as well. Could they be cut to the most important (judged by media response, difference from previous versions of windows, etc.), and preferably incorporated into prose? It seems very unlikely that this article can become an FA for a long while, as one of the criteria for that is "stable" - something this article necessarily can't be. But I agree this article will get attention and needs to be kept as good as possible. Trebor 18:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I certainly agree that FA isn't in the near future, I figure a year from now is the earliest time. Thanks for the comments! -/- Warren 19:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

• A few references are just the web address, the citeweb template thing could be used to tidy those up. Seegoon 14:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC)